The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs): Final Project Report

Amanda Beckles, Alison Ewart, Richard Tomlins

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This document is for the use of:
social sector landlords
other service providers
residents.
We are reporting on simple common sense aims – that service providers
should work with service consumers to:
 identify their most important areas for service improvement
 work with consumers, including frequently ignored groups, to measure
the improvements made.
This document offers a realistic pathway for service providers and
communities to respond to key current policy development. For example, core themes in the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Strong and Prosperous Communities White Paper are giving people more power over their own lives and the decisions that affect them. The White Paper, alongside the introduction of new and reduced baskets of Performance Indicators (PIs), includes a commitment to ensure that residents
have greater influence over the management of housing related services. Local authorities will be required to take steps, where appropriate, to ensure the participation of local citizens in their activities. In doing this authorities will need to give consideration to engaging with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups, such as disabled persons. Organisations can, therefore, jump ahead of the agenda by working with communities to devise their own PIs that are implemented, revised and replaced as necessary to direct resources most effectively. These are the Community Owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) that provide the focus of
this report. COPIs are developed by local residents for local residents and link directly to their neighbourhood. They are developed from their perspective and include the views of small or under represented groups. Essentially, COPIs are designed to reflect the needs, aspirations and expectations of the whole
community. This document contains three parts:
Part 1 the report primarily intended for people creating and working on strategies for performance management and/or customer involvement.
Part 2 the toolkit primarily for those whose interests are how to achieve effective customer involvement including with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups. This toolkit suggests that community engagement should be seen as a focused activity, where “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups are directly
approached and asked to research their own communities, resulting in engagement that is largely led by community members themselves. This social action research method has been used by research team members over a 15 year period.
Part 3 the indicative PIs is for those that are interested in how PIs could look at estate or area level and how they could be measured by communities. This part of the document links up the COPIs with existing PIs.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherChartered Institute of Housing
Number of pages63
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

community
performance
Group
customer
resident
service work
tertiary sector
management
action research
service provider
development policy
research method
housing
commitment
citizen
participation
human being
resources

Bibliographical note

Community Owned Performance Indicators project to establish a co-design and co-production route to Performance Indicators

Cite this

The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) : Final Project Report. / Beckles, Amanda ; Ewart, Alison ; Tomlins, Richard.

Chartered Institute of Housing, 2006. 63 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Beckles A, Ewart A, Tomlins R. The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs): Final Project Report. Chartered Institute of Housing, 2006. 63 p.
Beckles, Amanda ; Ewart, Alison ; Tomlins, Richard. / The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) : Final Project Report. Chartered Institute of Housing, 2006. 63 p.
@book{400be008e3f146d884c12e3a750b5caa,
title = "The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs): Final Project Report",
abstract = "This document is for the use of:social sector landlordsother service providersresidents.We are reporting on simple common sense aims – that service providersshould work with service consumers to: identify their most important areas for service improvement work with consumers, including frequently ignored groups, to measurethe improvements made.This document offers a realistic pathway for service providers andcommunities to respond to key current policy development. For example, core themes in the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Strong and Prosperous Communities White Paper are giving people more power over their own lives and the decisions that affect them. The White Paper, alongside the introduction of new and reduced baskets of Performance Indicators (PIs), includes a commitment to ensure that residentshave greater influence over the management of housing related services. Local authorities will be required to take steps, where appropriate, to ensure the participation of local citizens in their activities. In doing this authorities will need to give consideration to engaging with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups, such as disabled persons. Organisations can, therefore, jump ahead of the agenda by working with communities to devise their own PIs that are implemented, revised and replaced as necessary to direct resources most effectively. These are the Community Owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) that provide the focus ofthis report. COPIs are developed by local residents for local residents and link directly to their neighbourhood. They are developed from their perspective and include the views of small or under represented groups. Essentially, COPIs are designed to reflect the needs, aspirations and expectations of the wholecommunity. This document contains three parts:Part 1 the report primarily intended for people creating and working on strategies for performance management and/or customer involvement.Part 2 the toolkit primarily for those whose interests are how to achieve effective customer involvement including with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups. This toolkit suggests that community engagement should be seen as a focused activity, where “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups are directlyapproached and asked to research their own communities, resulting in engagement that is largely led by community members themselves. This social action research method has been used by research team members over a 15 year period.Part 3 the indicative PIs is for those that are interested in how PIs could look at estate or area level and how they could be measured by communities. This part of the document links up the COPIs with existing PIs.",
author = "Amanda Beckles and Alison Ewart and Richard Tomlins",
note = "Community Owned Performance Indicators project to establish a co-design and co-production route to Performance Indicators",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
publisher = "Chartered Institute of Housing",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs)

T2 - Final Project Report

AU - Beckles, Amanda

AU - Ewart, Alison

AU - Tomlins, Richard

N1 - Community Owned Performance Indicators project to establish a co-design and co-production route to Performance Indicators

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This document is for the use of:social sector landlordsother service providersresidents.We are reporting on simple common sense aims – that service providersshould work with service consumers to: identify their most important areas for service improvement work with consumers, including frequently ignored groups, to measurethe improvements made.This document offers a realistic pathway for service providers andcommunities to respond to key current policy development. For example, core themes in the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Strong and Prosperous Communities White Paper are giving people more power over their own lives and the decisions that affect them. The White Paper, alongside the introduction of new and reduced baskets of Performance Indicators (PIs), includes a commitment to ensure that residentshave greater influence over the management of housing related services. Local authorities will be required to take steps, where appropriate, to ensure the participation of local citizens in their activities. In doing this authorities will need to give consideration to engaging with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups, such as disabled persons. Organisations can, therefore, jump ahead of the agenda by working with communities to devise their own PIs that are implemented, revised and replaced as necessary to direct resources most effectively. These are the Community Owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) that provide the focus ofthis report. COPIs are developed by local residents for local residents and link directly to their neighbourhood. They are developed from their perspective and include the views of small or under represented groups. Essentially, COPIs are designed to reflect the needs, aspirations and expectations of the wholecommunity. This document contains three parts:Part 1 the report primarily intended for people creating and working on strategies for performance management and/or customer involvement.Part 2 the toolkit primarily for those whose interests are how to achieve effective customer involvement including with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups. This toolkit suggests that community engagement should be seen as a focused activity, where “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups are directlyapproached and asked to research their own communities, resulting in engagement that is largely led by community members themselves. This social action research method has been used by research team members over a 15 year period.Part 3 the indicative PIs is for those that are interested in how PIs could look at estate or area level and how they could be measured by communities. This part of the document links up the COPIs with existing PIs.

AB - This document is for the use of:social sector landlordsother service providersresidents.We are reporting on simple common sense aims – that service providersshould work with service consumers to: identify their most important areas for service improvement work with consumers, including frequently ignored groups, to measurethe improvements made.This document offers a realistic pathway for service providers andcommunities to respond to key current policy development. For example, core themes in the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Strong and Prosperous Communities White Paper are giving people more power over their own lives and the decisions that affect them. The White Paper, alongside the introduction of new and reduced baskets of Performance Indicators (PIs), includes a commitment to ensure that residentshave greater influence over the management of housing related services. Local authorities will be required to take steps, where appropriate, to ensure the participation of local citizens in their activities. In doing this authorities will need to give consideration to engaging with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups, such as disabled persons. Organisations can, therefore, jump ahead of the agenda by working with communities to devise their own PIs that are implemented, revised and replaced as necessary to direct resources most effectively. These are the Community Owned Performance Indicators (COPIs) that provide the focus ofthis report. COPIs are developed by local residents for local residents and link directly to their neighbourhood. They are developed from their perspective and include the views of small or under represented groups. Essentially, COPIs are designed to reflect the needs, aspirations and expectations of the wholecommunity. This document contains three parts:Part 1 the report primarily intended for people creating and working on strategies for performance management and/or customer involvement.Part 2 the toolkit primarily for those whose interests are how to achieve effective customer involvement including with “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups. This toolkit suggests that community engagement should be seen as a focused activity, where “hard to reach”/frequently ignored groups are directlyapproached and asked to research their own communities, resulting in engagement that is largely led by community members themselves. This social action research method has been used by research team members over a 15 year period.Part 3 the indicative PIs is for those that are interested in how PIs could look at estate or area level and how they could be measured by communities. This part of the document links up the COPIs with existing PIs.

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - The importance of community owned Performance Indicators (COPIs)

PB - Chartered Institute of Housing

ER -