The impact of intimate partner violence on preschool children's peer problems: An analysis of risk and protective factors

Erica Bowen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    It is unclear whether there is variation in the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on child peer problems, and which individual and environmental factors might predict such variation. This study uses data from 7,712 children (3,974, 51.5% boys) aged 4 from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Children were cross-categorized based on exposure to IPV from birth to 3 years, and mother-rated peer problems at age 4, into 4 groups: Resilient, Non-resilient, Vulnerable and Competent. Between-group differences in maternal depression, maternal life events, parenting, attachment, and temperament were analyzed, and these variables were also examined as predictors of group membership. Girls were more likely to be identified as resilient. In contrast to the non-resilient group, resilient boys were less emotional, had more secure attachment to their mothers, more interaction with their mothers’ partner, and their mothers reported fewer life events. For girls, the resilient group was less emotional, more sociable, and their mothers reported less depression. Temperament played a stronger role in resilience for girls than boys. There are sex differences in predictors of resilience to IPV within the peer problems outcome domain, which suggests that different approaches to intervention may be needed to foster resilience in boys and girls exposed to IPV.
    Publisher statement: Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons licenseNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Child Abuse & Neglect. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Child Abuse & Neglect, [50 (2015)] DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)141-150
    JournalChild Abuse & Neglect
    Volume50
    Early online date26 Sep 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    Preschool Children
    Mothers
    Temperament
    Child Abuse
    Publications
    Depression
    Peer Review
    Parenting
    Licensure
    Protective Factors
    Intimate Partner Violence
    Sex Characteristics
    Quality Control
    Longitudinal Studies
    Parents
    Parturition

    Bibliographical note

    Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust
    Under a Creative Commons license

    Keywords

    • ALSPAC
    • Resilience
    • Domestic violence
    • Pre-school
    • Longitudinal

    Cite this

    The impact of intimate partner violence on preschool children's peer problems: An analysis of risk and protective factors. / Bowen, Erica.

    In: Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 50, 12.2015, p. 141-150.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{81199435b82844faa566062854215154,
    title = "The impact of intimate partner violence on preschool children's peer problems: An analysis of risk and protective factors",
    abstract = "It is unclear whether there is variation in the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on child peer problems, and which individual and environmental factors might predict such variation. This study uses data from 7,712 children (3,974, 51.5{\%} boys) aged 4 from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Children were cross-categorized based on exposure to IPV from birth to 3 years, and mother-rated peer problems at age 4, into 4 groups: Resilient, Non-resilient, Vulnerable and Competent. Between-group differences in maternal depression, maternal life events, parenting, attachment, and temperament were analyzed, and these variables were also examined as predictors of group membership. Girls were more likely to be identified as resilient. In contrast to the non-resilient group, resilient boys were less emotional, had more secure attachment to their mothers, more interaction with their mothers’ partner, and their mothers reported fewer life events. For girls, the resilient group was less emotional, more sociable, and their mothers reported less depression. Temperament played a stronger role in resilience for girls than boys. There are sex differences in predictors of resilience to IPV within the peer problems outcome domain, which suggests that different approaches to intervention may be needed to foster resilience in boys and girls exposed to IPV.Publisher statement: Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons licenseNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Child Abuse & Neglect. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Child Abuse & Neglect, [50 (2015)] DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005{\circledC} 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
    keywords = "ALSPAC, Resilience, Domestic violence, Pre-school, Longitudinal",
    author = "Erica Bowen",
    note = "Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons license",
    year = "2015",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "141--150",
    journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
    issn = "0145-2134",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The impact of intimate partner violence on preschool children's peer problems: An analysis of risk and protective factors

    AU - Bowen, Erica

    N1 - Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons license

    PY - 2015/12

    Y1 - 2015/12

    N2 - It is unclear whether there is variation in the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on child peer problems, and which individual and environmental factors might predict such variation. This study uses data from 7,712 children (3,974, 51.5% boys) aged 4 from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Children were cross-categorized based on exposure to IPV from birth to 3 years, and mother-rated peer problems at age 4, into 4 groups: Resilient, Non-resilient, Vulnerable and Competent. Between-group differences in maternal depression, maternal life events, parenting, attachment, and temperament were analyzed, and these variables were also examined as predictors of group membership. Girls were more likely to be identified as resilient. In contrast to the non-resilient group, resilient boys were less emotional, had more secure attachment to their mothers, more interaction with their mothers’ partner, and their mothers reported fewer life events. For girls, the resilient group was less emotional, more sociable, and their mothers reported less depression. Temperament played a stronger role in resilience for girls than boys. There are sex differences in predictors of resilience to IPV within the peer problems outcome domain, which suggests that different approaches to intervention may be needed to foster resilience in boys and girls exposed to IPV.Publisher statement: Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons licenseNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Child Abuse & Neglect. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Child Abuse & Neglect, [50 (2015)] DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    AB - It is unclear whether there is variation in the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on child peer problems, and which individual and environmental factors might predict such variation. This study uses data from 7,712 children (3,974, 51.5% boys) aged 4 from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Children were cross-categorized based on exposure to IPV from birth to 3 years, and mother-rated peer problems at age 4, into 4 groups: Resilient, Non-resilient, Vulnerable and Competent. Between-group differences in maternal depression, maternal life events, parenting, attachment, and temperament were analyzed, and these variables were also examined as predictors of group membership. Girls were more likely to be identified as resilient. In contrast to the non-resilient group, resilient boys were less emotional, had more secure attachment to their mothers, more interaction with their mothers’ partner, and their mothers reported fewer life events. For girls, the resilient group was less emotional, more sociable, and their mothers reported less depression. Temperament played a stronger role in resilience for girls than boys. There are sex differences in predictors of resilience to IPV within the peer problems outcome domain, which suggests that different approaches to intervention may be needed to foster resilience in boys and girls exposed to IPV.Publisher statement: Open Access funded by Wellcome Trust Under a Creative Commons licenseNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Child Abuse & Neglect. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Child Abuse & Neglect, [50 (2015)] DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    KW - ALSPAC

    KW - Resilience

    KW - Domestic violence

    KW - Pre-school

    KW - Longitudinal

    U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 141

    EP - 150

    JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

    JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

    SN - 0145-2134

    ER -