The impact of climatic change on butterfly geography: does climatic change produce coincident trends in populations, distributions and ranges?

P.B. Hardy, Tim Sparks, R.L.H. Dennis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    With climatic warming is the expectation of coincident changes in distributions and range limits driven by population changes. An outstanding question is whether such coincident changes (positive or negative) occur, especially in smaller regions in which management for change tends to be conducted. Using atlas and survey monitoring data (BMS) we studied population and distribution changes in 31 butterfly species in North West England over three recording periods (1940–1994, 1995–2001, 2001–2007). We found that since the first recording period many more species have shifted their centres of gravity significantly northwards and uphill than have increased in population abundance (density) and distribution cover. At the same time, far fewer species have effectively shifted southwards and downhill than have decreased in density and distribution cover. A significant association between change in distribution cover and density is divorced from the weaker association between shifts in altitude and northing; whereas many species are gaining northwards and at higher altitude, they are doing so from a failing base at lower altitude and at the core of their distributions. Usually losses at lower altitudes are ascribed to loss of biotopes. But, declines in some species, such as Lasiommata megera, are occurring at a much faster rate than physical changes to the landscape and in land uses. The findings of this study indicate that changes in populations, distributions and ranges are a great deal more complex than hitherto considered. Currently, the basis for such rapid changes is not being supported by detailed autecology on species.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)855-876
    JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
    Volume23
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    population distribution
    geography
    butterfly
    butterflies
    climate change
    Lasiomma
    population ecology
    biotopes
    gravity
    global warming
    autecology
    England
    population density
    land use
    atlas
    distribution
    trend
    monitoring
    warming

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not available from the repository.
    The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com.

    Keywords

    • altitude
    • climatic change
    • distributions
    • latitude
    • population abundance
    • ranges

    Cite this

    The impact of climatic change on butterfly geography: does climatic change produce coincident trends in populations, distributions and ranges? / Hardy, P.B.; Sparks, Tim; Dennis, R.L.H.

    In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2014, p. 855-876.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{5e0251dc612146ea9b0e69c8c2e64a8f,
    title = "The impact of climatic change on butterfly geography: does climatic change produce coincident trends in populations, distributions and ranges?",
    abstract = "With climatic warming is the expectation of coincident changes in distributions and range limits driven by population changes. An outstanding question is whether such coincident changes (positive or negative) occur, especially in smaller regions in which management for change tends to be conducted. Using atlas and survey monitoring data (BMS) we studied population and distribution changes in 31 butterfly species in North West England over three recording periods (1940–1994, 1995–2001, 2001–2007). We found that since the first recording period many more species have shifted their centres of gravity significantly northwards and uphill than have increased in population abundance (density) and distribution cover. At the same time, far fewer species have effectively shifted southwards and downhill than have decreased in density and distribution cover. A significant association between change in distribution cover and density is divorced from the weaker association between shifts in altitude and northing; whereas many species are gaining northwards and at higher altitude, they are doing so from a failing base at lower altitude and at the core of their distributions. Usually losses at lower altitudes are ascribed to loss of biotopes. But, declines in some species, such as Lasiommata megera, are occurring at a much faster rate than physical changes to the landscape and in land uses. The findings of this study indicate that changes in populations, distributions and ranges are a great deal more complex than hitherto considered. Currently, the basis for such rapid changes is not being supported by detailed autecology on species.",
    keywords = "altitude, climatic change, distributions, latitude, population abundance, ranges",
    author = "P.B. Hardy and Tim Sparks and R.L.H. Dennis",
    note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository. The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com.",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1007/s10531-014-0637-2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "855--876",
    journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
    issn = "0960-3115",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The impact of climatic change on butterfly geography: does climatic change produce coincident trends in populations, distributions and ranges?

    AU - Hardy, P.B.

    AU - Sparks, Tim

    AU - Dennis, R.L.H.

    N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository. The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - With climatic warming is the expectation of coincident changes in distributions and range limits driven by population changes. An outstanding question is whether such coincident changes (positive or negative) occur, especially in smaller regions in which management for change tends to be conducted. Using atlas and survey monitoring data (BMS) we studied population and distribution changes in 31 butterfly species in North West England over three recording periods (1940–1994, 1995–2001, 2001–2007). We found that since the first recording period many more species have shifted their centres of gravity significantly northwards and uphill than have increased in population abundance (density) and distribution cover. At the same time, far fewer species have effectively shifted southwards and downhill than have decreased in density and distribution cover. A significant association between change in distribution cover and density is divorced from the weaker association between shifts in altitude and northing; whereas many species are gaining northwards and at higher altitude, they are doing so from a failing base at lower altitude and at the core of their distributions. Usually losses at lower altitudes are ascribed to loss of biotopes. But, declines in some species, such as Lasiommata megera, are occurring at a much faster rate than physical changes to the landscape and in land uses. The findings of this study indicate that changes in populations, distributions and ranges are a great deal more complex than hitherto considered. Currently, the basis for such rapid changes is not being supported by detailed autecology on species.

    AB - With climatic warming is the expectation of coincident changes in distributions and range limits driven by population changes. An outstanding question is whether such coincident changes (positive or negative) occur, especially in smaller regions in which management for change tends to be conducted. Using atlas and survey monitoring data (BMS) we studied population and distribution changes in 31 butterfly species in North West England over three recording periods (1940–1994, 1995–2001, 2001–2007). We found that since the first recording period many more species have shifted their centres of gravity significantly northwards and uphill than have increased in population abundance (density) and distribution cover. At the same time, far fewer species have effectively shifted southwards and downhill than have decreased in density and distribution cover. A significant association between change in distribution cover and density is divorced from the weaker association between shifts in altitude and northing; whereas many species are gaining northwards and at higher altitude, they are doing so from a failing base at lower altitude and at the core of their distributions. Usually losses at lower altitudes are ascribed to loss of biotopes. But, declines in some species, such as Lasiommata megera, are occurring at a much faster rate than physical changes to the landscape and in land uses. The findings of this study indicate that changes in populations, distributions and ranges are a great deal more complex than hitherto considered. Currently, the basis for such rapid changes is not being supported by detailed autecology on species.

    KW - altitude

    KW - climatic change

    KW - distributions

    KW - latitude

    KW - population abundance

    KW - ranges

    U2 - 10.1007/s10531-014-0637-2

    DO - 10.1007/s10531-014-0637-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 855

    EP - 876

    JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

    JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

    SN - 0960-3115

    IS - 4

    ER -