The Hybrid Legal Geographies of a War Crimes Court

Alex Jeffery, Michaelina Jakala

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article explores the implications of understanding war crime trials as hybrid legal spaces. Drawing on twelve months of residential fieldwork in the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, it examines the circulation of evidence, the choreography of the courtroom, and the nature and possibilities for legal observation. Analyzing hybrid legal geographies foregrounds the material and embodied nature of trials, illuminating the forms of comportment, categorization, and exclusion through which law establishes its legitimacy. Rather than emphasizing separation and distance, the lens of hybridity illuminates the multiple ways in which war crimes trials are grounded in the social and political context of present-day Bosnia and Herzegovina. Consequently, this analysis traces the disjuncture between the imagined geographies of legal jurisdiction and the material and embodied spaces of trial practices. In conclusion, we argue that the establishment of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina illustrates the tensions that emerge when an institution of trial justice is used to strengthen the coherence of a postconflict state
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)652-667
    JournalAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
    Volume104
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this article is not available from the repository.

    Keywords

    • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • hybrid geographies
    • legal geography
    • war crimes trials

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Hybrid Legal Geographies of a War Crimes Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this