The Heckler’s Promise

Mel Jordan, Lee Campbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    From gluing audience members to their seats and purposefully selling the same ticket to more than one person, artists associated with the Historical Avant-Garde often sought to provoke and antagonise by employing disruption via interruptive processes. This paper responds to Claire Bishop’s call for more agonism (Bishop, 2004) by inserting the heckler as both method and object into art performance. It is a hybrid of practice and theory, statement and response, test and experiment; it is a combination of all these things because you can’t really envisage a heckler without taking him out for the night putting him in the world and observing the exchanges that take place. We think that practicing heckling has got to be worth the aggravation.

    This paper seeks to do two things: first to explore the heckler as a ‘device’ for reassessing the potential of interruption in democratic exchange, in particular in relation to contemporary theories of art and participation and second to try it out; to put the heckler at the centre of an artwork. In short, we propose a rethinking of the heckler. Part 1: Heckle, Hiss, Howl and Holler asks if there is something worth considering in the process of heckling for democratic exchange and, Part 2: Contract, Collaboration, Countdown and Confrontation strikes out to see what happens when you present an artwork that trials a performance about heckling via the act of heckling. The inhospitable performance Contract with a Heckler demonstrates a complex knitting of theory and practice whereby argument is supported by the undertaking of action (by the necessity of experiencing interruption in practice) and reveals working with interruption on a theoretical, practical and emotional level can be exciting, provocative and dangerous. Exploring contractual agency through hostipitality (Derrida, 2000) wherein a host may be as hostile as she is hospitable, this performance reimagines the event of performance as an event of (in)hospitality by embodying an ambivalent conviviality and employing heckling to disrupt convivial participation (Bourriaud, 1998).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)126-140
    Number of pages15
    JournalPerformance Paradigm
    Volume14
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • Heckling
    • interruptions
    • performance as research
    • participation
    • transgression

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Heckler’s Promise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    • Impoliteness and Interaction 'Impolin'

      Mel Jordan (Speaker) & Lee Campbell (Speaker)

      23 May 201324 May 2013

      Activity: Participating in or organising an eventParticipation in conference

    • Heckler

      Mel Jordan (Speaker) & Lee Campbell (Speaker)

      13 Jul 2013

      Activity: Participating in or organising an eventParticipation in conference

    Cite this