The Enigmatic Exponent ⫯ and the Story of Finite-Size Scaling Above the Upper Critical Dimension

Scaling, hyperscaling and finite-size scaling were long considered problematic in theories of critical phenomena in high dimensions. The scaling relations themselves form a model-independent structure that any model-specific theory must adhere to, and they are accounted for by the simple principle of homogeneity. Finite-size scaling is similarly founded on the fundamental idea that only two length scales enter the game — namely system length and correlation length. While all scaling relations are quite satisfactory for multitudes of physical systems in low dimensions, one fails in high dimensions. The aberrant scaling relation is called hyperscaling and involves dimensionality itself. Finite-size scaling also appears to fail in high dimensions. Developed in the 1930s, Landau mean-field theory is valid in such high-dimensional systems. However, it too does not accord with hyperscaling and finite-size scaling there. The advent of renormalization-group theory in the 1970s brought deeper fundamental insights into critical phenomena, allowing systems to be viewed at different scales. Above a critical dimensionality, higher-order Renormalization Group (RG) eigenvalues become irrelevant and scaling is governed by the Gaussian fixed point. Although obeying all scaling relations including hyperscaling, and although it appears to successfully explain scaling in the correlation sector, the Gaussian fixed point fails to capture the free energy and derivatives, even in infinite volume. In the 1980s, to fix this for the magnetisation, specific heat and susceptibility, Fisher introduced the notion of dangerous irrelevant variables. Since the correlation sector did not appear to be broken, no attempt was made to repair it and Fisher’s modified RG formalism worked quite well in the thermodynamic limit of infinite volume. However, finite-size scaling fails. Also in the 1980’s, Binder, Nauenberg, Privman and Young extended Fisher’s concept to the free energy itself and to finite-size systems. While putting Fisher’s ideas on a more fundamental footing, the failure of finite-size scaling there still presented a problem. This appeared to be resolved by the introduction of “thermodynamic length” to replace correlation length as the length scale that controls Finite-Size Scaling (FSS). Thus hyperscaling and FSS were both sacrificed in favour of the RG patched together by ad hoc solutions. In the 1990’s, Luijten and Blöte went a long way to resolving the dilemma by adding corrections to scaling to the above considerations. It was clear that both of these played a role. However, as with previous authors, and adhering to the principle of not fixing that appears not to be broken, they did not address correlation length directly.

Here we report on developments over the past decade which went a long way to addressing these long-standing problems The key to unlocking these, and extending their validity to the high-dimensional regime, was to relax assumptions that the correlation length has to be bounded by the physical length of bounded systems. This allowed and necessitated the extension of Fisher’s concept of dangerous irrelevant variables to the correlation sector.