The emotional and professional wellbeing of Australian midwives: A comparison between those providing continuity of midwifery care and those not providing continuity

Background: Continuity of midwifery care contributes to significant positive outcomes for women and babies. There is a perception that providing continuity of care may negatively impact on the wellbeing and professional lives of midwives. Aim: To compare the emotional and professional wellbeing as well as satisfaction with time off and work-life balance of midwives providing continuity of care with midwives not providing continuity. Method: Online survey. Measures included; Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI); Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21; and Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale (PEMS-Revised). The sample (n = 862) was divided into two groups; midwives working in continuity (n = 214) and those not working in continuity (n = 648). Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups. Results: The continuity group had significantly lower scores on each of the burnout subscales (CBI Personal p =.002; CBI Work p <.001; CBI Client p <.001) and Anxiety (p =.007) and Depression (p =.004) sub-scales. Midwives providing continuity reported significantly higher scores on the PEMs Autonomy/Empowerment subscale (p <.001) and the Skills and Resources subscale (p =.002). There was no difference between the groups in terms of satisfaction with time off and work-life balance. Conclusion: Our results indicate that providing continuity of midwifery care is also beneficial for midwives. Conversely, midwives working in shift-based models providing fragmented care are at greater risk of psychological distress. Maternity service managers should feel confident that re-orientating care to align with the evidence is likely to improve workforce wellbeing and is a sustainable way forward.