The Effects of Using an Angle of Attack System on Pilot Performance and Workload during Selected Phases of Flight

Mike Bromfield, B. Dillman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    43 Downloads (Pure)


    In-flight loss of control (LoC-I) is the number one fatal accident category for light airplanes. The most common type of LoC-I accident involves a stall/spin and inadequate airspeed management and is frequently cited as a causal factor. An aircraft stalls when the critical angle of attack is exceeded and this may occur at any indicated airspeed, hence the use of airspeed as an indication to the proximity to stall is unreliable. This is of particular importance during the take-off, approach and landing where stall margins are reduced. Military aircraft commonly use angle of attack (AoA) devices to indicate proximity to the stall and these have been in continuous use for almost 60 years. More recently, with the simplification of light airplane design approval requirements, an increasing number of AoA designs are appearing on the market, installed in light airplanes to complement airspeed indication and stall warning systems, to notify pilots of proximity to the stall. This paper reviews a selection of current types of AoA devices and presents the preliminary results of practical flight testing and flight simulation experiments to investigate the effects of using an AoA on pilot performance and workload during selected phases of flight. The results have implications for the operational use of current AoA devices and future AoA design.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3222–3229
    JournalProcedia Manufacturing
    Early online date23 Oct 2015
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Bibliographical note

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (


    • Angle of attack
    • Loss of control
    • Workload
    • Stability


    Dive into the research topics of 'The Effects of Using an Angle of Attack System on Pilot Performance and Workload during Selected Phases of Flight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this