The effect of select pulp cavity conditions on stress field development in distal abutments in two types of fixed dental prostheses

Mirianthi Manda, Christos Galanis, Dimitrios Venetsanos, Christofer Provatidis, Petros Koidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Insufficient coronal tooth structure may require restoration of endodontically treated (ET) teeth with cast posts and cores (CPCs). The prognosis for these teeth is a matter of scientific debate, especially if they serve as distal abutments in cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The purpose of this study was to study stress field development in distal abutments in two types of FDPs with different pulp cavity conditions. Materials and Methods: The methodology involved the development of four digital models in which the right mandibular premolars were splinted via an FDP with: (1) no cantilever and a vital distal abutment, (2) no cantilever and an ET CPC distal abutment, (3) a single-unit cantilever and a vital distal abutment, and (4) a single-unit cantilever with an ET CPC distal abutment. The models were analyzed using a threedimensional finite element program, and von Mises stress values and patterns were evaluated. Results: The results revealed that although the stress distribution patterns in dentin were dissimilar, the von Mises stress values registered for the vital and ET CPC distal abutment were not considerably different. However, higher stress values were detected in the dentin area surrounding the post-gutta-percha interface after CPC placement. The addition of the cantilever resulted in a considerable increase in stress on the dental tissue structures. Conclusions: CPCs appear to create a risk of potential fracture that is initiated in the dentin at the apex of the post. The type of restoration appears to have a much more serious impact on the stress pattern developed in the distal abutment, and the addition of a cantilever appears to biomechanically compromise both biologic and restorative structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-126
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Prosthesis
Dentin
Tooth
Nonvital Tooth
Gutta-Percha
Bicuspid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

The effect of select pulp cavity conditions on stress field development in distal abutments in two types of fixed dental prostheses. / Manda, Mirianthi; Galanis, Christos; Venetsanos, Dimitrios; Provatidis, Christofer; Koidis, Petros.

In: International Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2011, p. 118-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1bfed1d2f9c468396bc870bec2c0794,
title = "The effect of select pulp cavity conditions on stress field development in distal abutments in two types of fixed dental prostheses",
abstract = "Purpose: Insufficient coronal tooth structure may require restoration of endodontically treated (ET) teeth with cast posts and cores (CPCs). The prognosis for these teeth is a matter of scientific debate, especially if they serve as distal abutments in cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The purpose of this study was to study stress field development in distal abutments in two types of FDPs with different pulp cavity conditions. Materials and Methods: The methodology involved the development of four digital models in which the right mandibular premolars were splinted via an FDP with: (1) no cantilever and a vital distal abutment, (2) no cantilever and an ET CPC distal abutment, (3) a single-unit cantilever and a vital distal abutment, and (4) a single-unit cantilever with an ET CPC distal abutment. The models were analyzed using a threedimensional finite element program, and von Mises stress values and patterns were evaluated. Results: The results revealed that although the stress distribution patterns in dentin were dissimilar, the von Mises stress values registered for the vital and ET CPC distal abutment were not considerably different. However, higher stress values were detected in the dentin area surrounding the post-gutta-percha interface after CPC placement. The addition of the cantilever resulted in a considerable increase in stress on the dental tissue structures. Conclusions: CPCs appear to create a risk of potential fracture that is initiated in the dentin at the apex of the post. The type of restoration appears to have a much more serious impact on the stress pattern developed in the distal abutment, and the addition of a cantilever appears to biomechanically compromise both biologic and restorative structures.",
author = "Mirianthi Manda and Christos Galanis and Dimitrios Venetsanos and Christofer Provatidis and Petros Koidis",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "118--126",
journal = "International Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "0893-2174",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of select pulp cavity conditions on stress field development in distal abutments in two types of fixed dental prostheses

AU - Manda, Mirianthi

AU - Galanis, Christos

AU - Venetsanos, Dimitrios

AU - Provatidis, Christofer

AU - Koidis, Petros

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: Insufficient coronal tooth structure may require restoration of endodontically treated (ET) teeth with cast posts and cores (CPCs). The prognosis for these teeth is a matter of scientific debate, especially if they serve as distal abutments in cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The purpose of this study was to study stress field development in distal abutments in two types of FDPs with different pulp cavity conditions. Materials and Methods: The methodology involved the development of four digital models in which the right mandibular premolars were splinted via an FDP with: (1) no cantilever and a vital distal abutment, (2) no cantilever and an ET CPC distal abutment, (3) a single-unit cantilever and a vital distal abutment, and (4) a single-unit cantilever with an ET CPC distal abutment. The models were analyzed using a threedimensional finite element program, and von Mises stress values and patterns were evaluated. Results: The results revealed that although the stress distribution patterns in dentin were dissimilar, the von Mises stress values registered for the vital and ET CPC distal abutment were not considerably different. However, higher stress values were detected in the dentin area surrounding the post-gutta-percha interface after CPC placement. The addition of the cantilever resulted in a considerable increase in stress on the dental tissue structures. Conclusions: CPCs appear to create a risk of potential fracture that is initiated in the dentin at the apex of the post. The type of restoration appears to have a much more serious impact on the stress pattern developed in the distal abutment, and the addition of a cantilever appears to biomechanically compromise both biologic and restorative structures.

AB - Purpose: Insufficient coronal tooth structure may require restoration of endodontically treated (ET) teeth with cast posts and cores (CPCs). The prognosis for these teeth is a matter of scientific debate, especially if they serve as distal abutments in cantilever fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The purpose of this study was to study stress field development in distal abutments in two types of FDPs with different pulp cavity conditions. Materials and Methods: The methodology involved the development of four digital models in which the right mandibular premolars were splinted via an FDP with: (1) no cantilever and a vital distal abutment, (2) no cantilever and an ET CPC distal abutment, (3) a single-unit cantilever and a vital distal abutment, and (4) a single-unit cantilever with an ET CPC distal abutment. The models were analyzed using a threedimensional finite element program, and von Mises stress values and patterns were evaluated. Results: The results revealed that although the stress distribution patterns in dentin were dissimilar, the von Mises stress values registered for the vital and ET CPC distal abutment were not considerably different. However, higher stress values were detected in the dentin area surrounding the post-gutta-percha interface after CPC placement. The addition of the cantilever resulted in a considerable increase in stress on the dental tissue structures. Conclusions: CPCs appear to create a risk of potential fracture that is initiated in the dentin at the apex of the post. The type of restoration appears to have a much more serious impact on the stress pattern developed in the distal abutment, and the addition of a cantilever appears to biomechanically compromise both biologic and restorative structures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957795953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 118

EP - 126

JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 0893-2174

IS - 2

ER -