The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica)

Caroline A. Gouws, Nathan M. D’Cunha, Ekavi N. Georgousopoulou, Duane D. Mellor, Nenad Naumovski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract: Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus indica) is commonly consumed but limited by short harvesting seasons and shelf life. Drying may resolve such issues. The effects of different methods were examined to investigate the phytochemicals in Australian prickly pear (PP). White, orange and purple fruits were dried using freeze-drying, microwave, draft-oven, and dehydrator-drying (35°C, 55°C, and 75°C). Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Total Flavonol Content (TFC), Total Betalain Content (TBC), Betacyanin (BE), and Betaxanthin (IE) and antioxidant characteristics (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl [DPPH], Cupric Ion Antioxidant Reducing Capacity [CUPRAC], and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power [FRAP]) were determined as methanolic extracts (skin/flesh). The highest content is as follows: TPC (149 ± 5.06 µg GAE ; microwave; purple skin), TFC (76.6 ± 1.98 µg CE ; microwave; purple-skin), TBC (4.17 ± 0.846 mg/100 g; freeze-dried; orange-skin and flesh), BE (2.29 ± 1.00 mg BE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh), IE (3.42 ± 0.569 mg IE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh); DPPH (224 ± 41.2 µM TE ; freeze-dried; white-flesh), CUPRAC (2,937 ± 43.3 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin) and FRAP (1,377 ± 27.0 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin). Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred between drying methods. When compared to freeze drying, microwaving, in some cases elicited the highest content. Practical applications: The gap between the nutrient-dense prickly pear fruit, and its consumption is prominent, particularly in Australia. This is potentially the consequences of social misconceptions, a short harvesting season and shelf life, thus potentially contributing to Australia's growing food waste challenge. Therefore, such obstacles could be reduced with the use of the most appropriate drying technique in order to extend the products shelf life. Our manuscript investigates the effect of different drying techniques on the phytochemical content of the prickly pear fruit. The investigated drying methods were considered accessible to small agricultural producers, the predominant farmers for this fruit in Australia. The findings of this paper can be potentially implemented in agricultural practice, assisting with year-round food supply and reduce on-site foods waste.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13900
JournalJournal of Food Processing and Preservation
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date15 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Opuntia
Pyrus
Opuntia ficus-indica
Phytochemicals
Antioxidants
phytopharmaceuticals
Microwaves
Drying
drying
antioxidants
Skin
Fruit
Betalains
Fruits
betalains
shelf life
food waste
fruits
Freeze Drying
freeze drying

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica). / Gouws, Caroline A.; D’Cunha, Nathan M.; Georgousopoulou, Ekavi N.; Mellor, Duane D.; Naumovski, Nenad.

In: Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, Vol. 43, No. 3, e13900, 03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gouws, Caroline A. ; D’Cunha, Nathan M. ; Georgousopoulou, Ekavi N. ; Mellor, Duane D. ; Naumovski, Nenad. / The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica). In: Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 3.
@article{389e4de00eaf4f3b9c21085a6bc82f51,
title = "The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica)",
abstract = "Abstract: Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus indica) is commonly consumed but limited by short harvesting seasons and shelf life. Drying may resolve such issues. The effects of different methods were examined to investigate the phytochemicals in Australian prickly pear (PP). White, orange and purple fruits were dried using freeze-drying, microwave, draft-oven, and dehydrator-drying (35°C, 55°C, and 75°C). Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Total Flavonol Content (TFC), Total Betalain Content (TBC), Betacyanin (BE), and Betaxanthin (IE) and antioxidant characteristics (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl [DPPH], Cupric Ion Antioxidant Reducing Capacity [CUPRAC], and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power [FRAP]) were determined as methanolic extracts (skin/flesh). The highest content is as follows: TPC (149 ± 5.06 µg GAE ; microwave; purple skin), TFC (76.6 ± 1.98 µg CE ; microwave; purple-skin), TBC (4.17 ± 0.846 mg/100 g; freeze-dried; orange-skin and flesh), BE (2.29 ± 1.00 mg BE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh), IE (3.42 ± 0.569 mg IE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh); DPPH (224 ± 41.2 µM TE ; freeze-dried; white-flesh), CUPRAC (2,937 ± 43.3 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin) and FRAP (1,377 ± 27.0 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin). Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred between drying methods. When compared to freeze drying, microwaving, in some cases elicited the highest content. Practical applications: The gap between the nutrient-dense prickly pear fruit, and its consumption is prominent, particularly in Australia. This is potentially the consequences of social misconceptions, a short harvesting season and shelf life, thus potentially contributing to Australia's growing food waste challenge. Therefore, such obstacles could be reduced with the use of the most appropriate drying technique in order to extend the products shelf life. Our manuscript investigates the effect of different drying techniques on the phytochemical content of the prickly pear fruit. The investigated drying methods were considered accessible to small agricultural producers, the predominant farmers for this fruit in Australia. The findings of this paper can be potentially implemented in agricultural practice, assisting with year-round food supply and reduce on-site foods waste.",
author = "Gouws, {Caroline A.} and D’Cunha, {Nathan M.} and Georgousopoulou, {Ekavi N.} and Mellor, {Duane D.} and Nenad Naumovski",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/jfpp.13900",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
journal = "Journal of Food Processing and Preservation",
issn = "0145-8892",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica)

AU - Gouws, Caroline A.

AU - D’Cunha, Nathan M.

AU - Georgousopoulou, Ekavi N.

AU - Mellor, Duane D.

AU - Naumovski, Nenad

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Abstract: Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus indica) is commonly consumed but limited by short harvesting seasons and shelf life. Drying may resolve such issues. The effects of different methods were examined to investigate the phytochemicals in Australian prickly pear (PP). White, orange and purple fruits were dried using freeze-drying, microwave, draft-oven, and dehydrator-drying (35°C, 55°C, and 75°C). Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Total Flavonol Content (TFC), Total Betalain Content (TBC), Betacyanin (BE), and Betaxanthin (IE) and antioxidant characteristics (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl [DPPH], Cupric Ion Antioxidant Reducing Capacity [CUPRAC], and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power [FRAP]) were determined as methanolic extracts (skin/flesh). The highest content is as follows: TPC (149 ± 5.06 µg GAE ; microwave; purple skin), TFC (76.6 ± 1.98 µg CE ; microwave; purple-skin), TBC (4.17 ± 0.846 mg/100 g; freeze-dried; orange-skin and flesh), BE (2.29 ± 1.00 mg BE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh), IE (3.42 ± 0.569 mg IE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh); DPPH (224 ± 41.2 µM TE ; freeze-dried; white-flesh), CUPRAC (2,937 ± 43.3 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin) and FRAP (1,377 ± 27.0 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin). Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred between drying methods. When compared to freeze drying, microwaving, in some cases elicited the highest content. Practical applications: The gap between the nutrient-dense prickly pear fruit, and its consumption is prominent, particularly in Australia. This is potentially the consequences of social misconceptions, a short harvesting season and shelf life, thus potentially contributing to Australia's growing food waste challenge. Therefore, such obstacles could be reduced with the use of the most appropriate drying technique in order to extend the products shelf life. Our manuscript investigates the effect of different drying techniques on the phytochemical content of the prickly pear fruit. The investigated drying methods were considered accessible to small agricultural producers, the predominant farmers for this fruit in Australia. The findings of this paper can be potentially implemented in agricultural practice, assisting with year-round food supply and reduce on-site foods waste.

AB - Abstract: Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus indica) is commonly consumed but limited by short harvesting seasons and shelf life. Drying may resolve such issues. The effects of different methods were examined to investigate the phytochemicals in Australian prickly pear (PP). White, orange and purple fruits were dried using freeze-drying, microwave, draft-oven, and dehydrator-drying (35°C, 55°C, and 75°C). Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Total Flavonol Content (TFC), Total Betalain Content (TBC), Betacyanin (BE), and Betaxanthin (IE) and antioxidant characteristics (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl [DPPH], Cupric Ion Antioxidant Reducing Capacity [CUPRAC], and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power [FRAP]) were determined as methanolic extracts (skin/flesh). The highest content is as follows: TPC (149 ± 5.06 µg GAE ; microwave; purple skin), TFC (76.6 ± 1.98 µg CE ; microwave; purple-skin), TBC (4.17 ± 0.846 mg/100 g; freeze-dried; orange-skin and flesh), BE (2.29 ± 1.00 mg BE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh), IE (3.42 ± 0.569 mg IE /100 g; freeze-dried; purple-flesh); DPPH (224 ± 41.2 µM TE ; freeze-dried; white-flesh), CUPRAC (2,937 ± 43.3 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin) and FRAP (1,377 ± 27.0 µM TE ; microwave; purple-skin). Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred between drying methods. When compared to freeze drying, microwaving, in some cases elicited the highest content. Practical applications: The gap between the nutrient-dense prickly pear fruit, and its consumption is prominent, particularly in Australia. This is potentially the consequences of social misconceptions, a short harvesting season and shelf life, thus potentially contributing to Australia's growing food waste challenge. Therefore, such obstacles could be reduced with the use of the most appropriate drying technique in order to extend the products shelf life. Our manuscript investigates the effect of different drying techniques on the phytochemical content of the prickly pear fruit. The investigated drying methods were considered accessible to small agricultural producers, the predominant farmers for this fruit in Australia. The findings of this paper can be potentially implemented in agricultural practice, assisting with year-round food supply and reduce on-site foods waste.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061565343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jfpp.13900

DO - 10.1111/jfpp.13900

M3 - Article

VL - 43

JO - Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

JF - Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

SN - 0145-8892

IS - 3

M1 - e13900

ER -