The dynamic emergence of minimal groups

Christopher Michael Jackson, Joshua Conrad Jackson, David Bilkey, Jonathan Jong, Jamin Halberstadt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The minimal group paradigm has consistently shown that people will discriminate to favor their own group over an out-group, even when both groups are created arbitrarily by an experimenter. But will people actually form groups that are so arbitrary? And could something as trivial as a randomly assigned name tag color serve as a fault line during group formation? In this study, we use in vivo behavioral tracking (IBT) to precisely and unobtrusively track samples of participants as they assort repeatedly into groups. We find that participants do form groups on the basis of their randomly assigned name tag colors, but that name tag homophily emerges over time, becoming stronger in subsequent groups. Our results suggest that people are unconsciously or consciously biased toward group similarity, even when similarities are essentially meaningless. Our study has implications for theories of intergroup relations and social identity. It also demonstrates the utility of applying real-time tracking to study group formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)921-929
Number of pages9
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume22
Issue number7
Early online date29 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Names
Color
Social Identification
Group
group formation
Tag
outgroup
study group
paradigm
Fault
Paradigm
Experimenter
Homophily
Social Identity

Keywords

  • group formation
  • in vivo behavioral tracking
  • minimal group
  • similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Jackson, C. M., Jackson, J. C., Bilkey, D., Jong, J., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The dynamic emergence of minimal groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(7), 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218802636

The dynamic emergence of minimal groups. / Jackson, Christopher Michael; Jackson, Joshua Conrad; Bilkey, David; Jong, Jonathan; Halberstadt, Jamin.

In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 22, No. 7, 01.10.2019, p. 921-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, CM, Jackson, JC, Bilkey, D, Jong, J & Halberstadt, J 2019, 'The dynamic emergence of minimal groups' Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218802636
Jackson, Christopher Michael ; Jackson, Joshua Conrad ; Bilkey, David ; Jong, Jonathan ; Halberstadt, Jamin. / The dynamic emergence of minimal groups. In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2019 ; Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 921-929.
@article{8d6f2ceaae0341ed9c4e508c4bcbec68,
title = "The dynamic emergence of minimal groups",
abstract = "The minimal group paradigm has consistently shown that people will discriminate to favor their own group over an out-group, even when both groups are created arbitrarily by an experimenter. But will people actually form groups that are so arbitrary? And could something as trivial as a randomly assigned name tag color serve as a fault line during group formation? In this study, we use in vivo behavioral tracking (IBT) to precisely and unobtrusively track samples of participants as they assort repeatedly into groups. We find that participants do form groups on the basis of their randomly assigned name tag colors, but that name tag homophily emerges over time, becoming stronger in subsequent groups. Our results suggest that people are unconsciously or consciously biased toward group similarity, even when similarities are essentially meaningless. Our study has implications for theories of intergroup relations and social identity. It also demonstrates the utility of applying real-time tracking to study group formation.",
keywords = "group formation, in vivo behavioral tracking, minimal group, similarity",
author = "Jackson, {Christopher Michael} and Jackson, {Joshua Conrad} and David Bilkey and Jonathan Jong and Jamin Halberstadt",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1368430218802636",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "921--929",
journal = "Group Processes and Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamic emergence of minimal groups

AU - Jackson, Christopher Michael

AU - Jackson, Joshua Conrad

AU - Bilkey, David

AU - Jong, Jonathan

AU - Halberstadt, Jamin

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - The minimal group paradigm has consistently shown that people will discriminate to favor their own group over an out-group, even when both groups are created arbitrarily by an experimenter. But will people actually form groups that are so arbitrary? And could something as trivial as a randomly assigned name tag color serve as a fault line during group formation? In this study, we use in vivo behavioral tracking (IBT) to precisely and unobtrusively track samples of participants as they assort repeatedly into groups. We find that participants do form groups on the basis of their randomly assigned name tag colors, but that name tag homophily emerges over time, becoming stronger in subsequent groups. Our results suggest that people are unconsciously or consciously biased toward group similarity, even when similarities are essentially meaningless. Our study has implications for theories of intergroup relations and social identity. It also demonstrates the utility of applying real-time tracking to study group formation.

AB - The minimal group paradigm has consistently shown that people will discriminate to favor their own group over an out-group, even when both groups are created arbitrarily by an experimenter. But will people actually form groups that are so arbitrary? And could something as trivial as a randomly assigned name tag color serve as a fault line during group formation? In this study, we use in vivo behavioral tracking (IBT) to precisely and unobtrusively track samples of participants as they assort repeatedly into groups. We find that participants do form groups on the basis of their randomly assigned name tag colors, but that name tag homophily emerges over time, becoming stronger in subsequent groups. Our results suggest that people are unconsciously or consciously biased toward group similarity, even when similarities are essentially meaningless. Our study has implications for theories of intergroup relations and social identity. It also demonstrates the utility of applying real-time tracking to study group formation.

KW - group formation

KW - in vivo behavioral tracking

KW - minimal group

KW - similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059002501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368430218802636

DO - 10.1177/1368430218802636

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 921

EP - 929

JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 7

ER -