The dose–response relationship between training-load measures and aerobic fitness in elite academy soccer players

Matthew Ellis; Ryan Penny; Ben Wright; Mark Noon; Tony Myers; Ibrahim Akubat

doi:10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536

The dose–response relationship between training-load measures and aerobic fitness in elite academy soccer players

Matthew Ellis, Ryan Penny, Ben Wright, Mark Noon, Tony Myers, Ibrahim Akubat

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

176 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to examine the dose–response relationships between training load (TL) measures and the consequent changes in aerobic fitness. Data were collected over the 6-week pre-season period in elite youth soccer players. Participants completed a lactate threshold test to identify changes in treadmill speed at 2 mmol · l−1 (S2) and 4 mmol · l−1 (S4). Internal TL was quantified with the following training impulse (TRIMP) methods: Banister TRIMP, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP, individual TRIMP (iTRIMP) and rate of perceived exertion was also collected. External TL measures were total distance, PlayerLoad, high speed running (14.4–19.8 km · h−1), very high-speed running (19.8–25.2 km · h−1) and maximal sprint distance (>25.2 km · h−1). Individual high-speed distance was derived from each participants treadmill speed at S4. Different Bayesian regression models were run with different likelihood functions. The best-fitting models with both the lowest out-of-sample prediction error and the highest variance explained (R 2) were used. iTRIMP had the strongest relationships with changes in S2 (r = 0.93, R2 = 0.90) and S4 (r = 0.88, R2 = 0.82). Explained variance ranged from 10%–69% and 11%–38% for all other internal TL measures and external measures, respectively. In summary, the iTRIMP method demonstrates a dose–response relationship with changes in aerobic fitness in elite youth soccer players.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	128-136
Number of pages	9
Journal	Science and Medicine in Football
Volume	5
Issue number	2
Early online date	9 Sept 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science and Medicine in Football, on 09/09/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

iTRIMP
GPS
monitoring

Access to Document

10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536

Post-PrintAccepted author manuscript, 526 KB

Cite this

@article{a7cbf503f4f6449b82adbcef25a934eb,

title = "The dose–response relationship between training-load measures and aerobic fitness in elite academy soccer players",

abstract = "The aim of the current study is to examine the dose–response relationships between training load (TL) measures and the consequent changes in aerobic fitness. Data were collected over the 6-week pre-season period in elite youth soccer players. Participants completed a lactate threshold test to identify changes in treadmill speed at 2 mmol · l−1 (S2) and 4 mmol · l−1 (S4). Internal TL was quantified with the following training impulse (TRIMP) methods: Banister TRIMP, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP, individual TRIMP (iTRIMP) and rate of perceived exertion was also collected. External TL measures were total distance, PlayerLoad, high speed running (14.4–19.8 km · h−1), very high-speed running (19.8–25.2 km · h−1) and maximal sprint distance (>25.2 km · h−1). Individual high-speed distance was derived from each participants treadmill speed at S4. Different Bayesian regression models were run with different likelihood functions. The best-fitting models with both the lowest out-of-sample prediction error and the highest variance explained (R 2) were used. iTRIMP had the strongest relationships with changes in S2 (r = 0.93, R2 = 0.90) and S4 (r = 0.88, R2 = 0.82). Explained variance ranged from 10%–69% and 11%–38% for all other internal TL measures and external measures, respectively. In summary, the iTRIMP method demonstrates a dose–response relationship with changes in aerobic fitness in elite youth soccer players.",

keywords = "iTRIMP, GPS, monitoring",

author = "Matthew Ellis and Ryan Penny and Ben Wright and Mark Noon and Tony Myers and Ibrahim Akubat",

note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science and Medicine in Football, on 09/09/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536 Copyright {\textcopyright} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. ",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "128--136",

journal = "Science and Medicine in Football",

issn = "2473-3938",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dose–response relationship between training-load measures and aerobic fitness in elite academy soccer players

AU - Ellis, Matthew

AU - Penny, Ryan

AU - Wright, Ben

AU - Noon, Mark

AU - Myers, Tony

AU - Akubat, Ibrahim

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science and Medicine in Football, on 09/09/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The aim of the current study is to examine the dose–response relationships between training load (TL) measures and the consequent changes in aerobic fitness. Data were collected over the 6-week pre-season period in elite youth soccer players. Participants completed a lactate threshold test to identify changes in treadmill speed at 2 mmol · l−1 (S2) and 4 mmol · l−1 (S4). Internal TL was quantified with the following training impulse (TRIMP) methods: Banister TRIMP, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP, individual TRIMP (iTRIMP) and rate of perceived exertion was also collected. External TL measures were total distance, PlayerLoad, high speed running (14.4–19.8 km · h−1), very high-speed running (19.8–25.2 km · h−1) and maximal sprint distance (>25.2 km · h−1). Individual high-speed distance was derived from each participants treadmill speed at S4. Different Bayesian regression models were run with different likelihood functions. The best-fitting models with both the lowest out-of-sample prediction error and the highest variance explained (R 2) were used. iTRIMP had the strongest relationships with changes in S2 (r = 0.93, R2 = 0.90) and S4 (r = 0.88, R2 = 0.82). Explained variance ranged from 10%–69% and 11%–38% for all other internal TL measures and external measures, respectively. In summary, the iTRIMP method demonstrates a dose–response relationship with changes in aerobic fitness in elite youth soccer players.

AB - The aim of the current study is to examine the dose–response relationships between training load (TL) measures and the consequent changes in aerobic fitness. Data were collected over the 6-week pre-season period in elite youth soccer players. Participants completed a lactate threshold test to identify changes in treadmill speed at 2 mmol · l−1 (S2) and 4 mmol · l−1 (S4). Internal TL was quantified with the following training impulse (TRIMP) methods: Banister TRIMP, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP, individual TRIMP (iTRIMP) and rate of perceived exertion was also collected. External TL measures were total distance, PlayerLoad, high speed running (14.4–19.8 km · h−1), very high-speed running (19.8–25.2 km · h−1) and maximal sprint distance (>25.2 km · h−1). Individual high-speed distance was derived from each participants treadmill speed at S4. Different Bayesian regression models were run with different likelihood functions. The best-fitting models with both the lowest out-of-sample prediction error and the highest variance explained (R 2) were used. iTRIMP had the strongest relationships with changes in S2 (r = 0.93, R2 = 0.90) and S4 (r = 0.88, R2 = 0.82). Explained variance ranged from 10%–69% and 11%–38% for all other internal TL measures and external measures, respectively. In summary, the iTRIMP method demonstrates a dose–response relationship with changes in aerobic fitness in elite youth soccer players.

KW - iTRIMP

KW - GPS

KW - monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090459234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536

DO - 10.1080/24733938.2020.1817536

M3 - Article

SN - 2473-3938

VL - 5

SP - 128

EP - 136

JO - Science and Medicine in Football

JF - Science and Medicine in Football

IS - 2

ER -

The dose–response relationship between training-load measures and aerobic fitness in elite academy soccer players

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this