The Dialogic: art work as method

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

233 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper discusses how the multisite artwork The Dialogic demonstrates an innovative, supportive and generative artwork-as-method which resists overly reductive, and prescriptive tendencies within practice-led research. It continues a dialogue between participants that has been ongoing since 2012. The Dialogic has been adapted through the work of multiple artists, and this iteration is offered as a dialogue between the artists John Hammersley and Rachelle Viader Knowles in response to reflections in the work of Simon Pope. The Dialogic emerged as a method-work which imbricates the artist in socially situated exchange across multiple contexts, enacts coauthored and co-produced meaning-making, and challenges assumptions about the separation of art and research and notions of the detached artist-researcher. Its innovative contribution to practice-led research is how it demonstrates dialogical art as the on-going re-construction of a community of support, sustained through a commitment to knowledge mobilization, continued exchange and engagement in which the artist and their work are ‘answerable’ for the choices and actions in their art-as-research. The work functions as a generative research tool. It demonstrates how semi-structured everyday conversational-exchange-as-art can simultaneously lead to the emergence of subconsciously held insights, construct a community of practice that helps shape thinking outside of institutional frameworks, and act as a situated literature review that may disrupt traditional frameworks of knowledge production normalized in much fine art research. The authors argue that this method is appropriate to dialogical art-as-research as it makes a necessary contribution to the practice-led research tool box. It offers a method of distributive authorship grounded in an emergent, situated and more provisional mode of meaning-making that facilitates generous, democratized, peer-to-peer co-mentorship and skill-sharing contributing to understandings of dialogical art as research. This they argue is an increasingly necessary counterpoint to the reduction of practice-led fine art research to a training in mechanistic methods, reductive evaluation, and singular concrete outcomes aimed at satisfying the artist-researcher as customer and consumer.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnknown Host Publication
PublisherNational Association of Fine Art Educators
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016
EventNational Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) Fine Art Research Network Symposium - Cumbria, United Kingdom
Duration: 15 Jul 201615 Jul 2016

Conference

ConferenceNational Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) Fine Art Research Network Symposium
CountryUnited Kingdom
Period15/07/1615/07/16

Fingerprint

artist
art
research practice
fine arts
dialogue
knowledge production
pope
community
mobilization
customer
commitment
evaluation

Bibliographical note

This co-authored paper was delivered at the National Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) conference at the University of Cumbria, 15 July 2016, and published online at: http://www.nafae.org.uk/sites/default/files/presentations/knowles_hammersley_paper.pdf

It is also based on 'Dialogic' which is a multi-site artwork.

Keywords

  • dialogue
  • practice-led research
  • generative method
  • collaboration
  • community of support

Cite this

Hammersley, J., & Knowles, R. V. (2016). The Dialogic: art work as method. In Unknown Host Publication National Association of Fine Art Educators.

The Dialogic: art work as method. / Hammersley, J.; Knowles, Rachelle Viader.

Unknown Host Publication. National Association of Fine Art Educators, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Hammersley, J & Knowles, RV 2016, The Dialogic: art work as method. in Unknown Host Publication. National Association of Fine Art Educators, National Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) Fine Art Research Network Symposium, United Kingdom, 15/07/16.
Hammersley J, Knowles RV. The Dialogic: art work as method. In Unknown Host Publication. National Association of Fine Art Educators. 2016
Hammersley, J. ; Knowles, Rachelle Viader. / The Dialogic: art work as method. Unknown Host Publication. National Association of Fine Art Educators, 2016.
@inproceedings{1f564aa461884b75918315e21e13b8c8,
title = "The Dialogic: art work as method",
abstract = "This paper discusses how the multisite artwork The Dialogic demonstrates an innovative, supportive and generative artwork-as-method which resists overly reductive, and prescriptive tendencies within practice-led research. It continues a dialogue between participants that has been ongoing since 2012. The Dialogic has been adapted through the work of multiple artists, and this iteration is offered as a dialogue between the artists John Hammersley and Rachelle Viader Knowles in response to reflections in the work of Simon Pope. The Dialogic emerged as a method-work which imbricates the artist in socially situated exchange across multiple contexts, enacts coauthored and co-produced meaning-making, and challenges assumptions about the separation of art and research and notions of the detached artist-researcher. Its innovative contribution to practice-led research is how it demonstrates dialogical art as the on-going re-construction of a community of support, sustained through a commitment to knowledge mobilization, continued exchange and engagement in which the artist and their work are ‘answerable’ for the choices and actions in their art-as-research. The work functions as a generative research tool. It demonstrates how semi-structured everyday conversational-exchange-as-art can simultaneously lead to the emergence of subconsciously held insights, construct a community of practice that helps shape thinking outside of institutional frameworks, and act as a situated literature review that may disrupt traditional frameworks of knowledge production normalized in much fine art research. The authors argue that this method is appropriate to dialogical art-as-research as it makes a necessary contribution to the practice-led research tool box. It offers a method of distributive authorship grounded in an emergent, situated and more provisional mode of meaning-making that facilitates generous, democratized, peer-to-peer co-mentorship and skill-sharing contributing to understandings of dialogical art as research. This they argue is an increasingly necessary counterpoint to the reduction of practice-led fine art research to a training in mechanistic methods, reductive evaluation, and singular concrete outcomes aimed at satisfying the artist-researcher as customer and consumer.",
keywords = "dialogue, practice-led research, generative method, collaboration, community of support",
author = "J. Hammersley and Knowles, {Rachelle Viader}",
note = "This co-authored paper was delivered at the National Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) conference at the University of Cumbria, 15 July 2016, and published online at: http://www.nafae.org.uk/sites/default/files/presentations/knowles_hammersley_paper.pdf It is also based on 'Dialogic' which is a multi-site artwork.",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",
publisher = "National Association of Fine Art Educators",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The Dialogic: art work as method

AU - Hammersley, J.

AU - Knowles, Rachelle Viader

N1 - This co-authored paper was delivered at the National Association of Fine Art Educators (NAFAE) conference at the University of Cumbria, 15 July 2016, and published online at: http://www.nafae.org.uk/sites/default/files/presentations/knowles_hammersley_paper.pdf It is also based on 'Dialogic' which is a multi-site artwork.

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - This paper discusses how the multisite artwork The Dialogic demonstrates an innovative, supportive and generative artwork-as-method which resists overly reductive, and prescriptive tendencies within practice-led research. It continues a dialogue between participants that has been ongoing since 2012. The Dialogic has been adapted through the work of multiple artists, and this iteration is offered as a dialogue between the artists John Hammersley and Rachelle Viader Knowles in response to reflections in the work of Simon Pope. The Dialogic emerged as a method-work which imbricates the artist in socially situated exchange across multiple contexts, enacts coauthored and co-produced meaning-making, and challenges assumptions about the separation of art and research and notions of the detached artist-researcher. Its innovative contribution to practice-led research is how it demonstrates dialogical art as the on-going re-construction of a community of support, sustained through a commitment to knowledge mobilization, continued exchange and engagement in which the artist and their work are ‘answerable’ for the choices and actions in their art-as-research. The work functions as a generative research tool. It demonstrates how semi-structured everyday conversational-exchange-as-art can simultaneously lead to the emergence of subconsciously held insights, construct a community of practice that helps shape thinking outside of institutional frameworks, and act as a situated literature review that may disrupt traditional frameworks of knowledge production normalized in much fine art research. The authors argue that this method is appropriate to dialogical art-as-research as it makes a necessary contribution to the practice-led research tool box. It offers a method of distributive authorship grounded in an emergent, situated and more provisional mode of meaning-making that facilitates generous, democratized, peer-to-peer co-mentorship and skill-sharing contributing to understandings of dialogical art as research. This they argue is an increasingly necessary counterpoint to the reduction of practice-led fine art research to a training in mechanistic methods, reductive evaluation, and singular concrete outcomes aimed at satisfying the artist-researcher as customer and consumer.

AB - This paper discusses how the multisite artwork The Dialogic demonstrates an innovative, supportive and generative artwork-as-method which resists overly reductive, and prescriptive tendencies within practice-led research. It continues a dialogue between participants that has been ongoing since 2012. The Dialogic has been adapted through the work of multiple artists, and this iteration is offered as a dialogue between the artists John Hammersley and Rachelle Viader Knowles in response to reflections in the work of Simon Pope. The Dialogic emerged as a method-work which imbricates the artist in socially situated exchange across multiple contexts, enacts coauthored and co-produced meaning-making, and challenges assumptions about the separation of art and research and notions of the detached artist-researcher. Its innovative contribution to practice-led research is how it demonstrates dialogical art as the on-going re-construction of a community of support, sustained through a commitment to knowledge mobilization, continued exchange and engagement in which the artist and their work are ‘answerable’ for the choices and actions in their art-as-research. The work functions as a generative research tool. It demonstrates how semi-structured everyday conversational-exchange-as-art can simultaneously lead to the emergence of subconsciously held insights, construct a community of practice that helps shape thinking outside of institutional frameworks, and act as a situated literature review that may disrupt traditional frameworks of knowledge production normalized in much fine art research. The authors argue that this method is appropriate to dialogical art-as-research as it makes a necessary contribution to the practice-led research tool box. It offers a method of distributive authorship grounded in an emergent, situated and more provisional mode of meaning-making that facilitates generous, democratized, peer-to-peer co-mentorship and skill-sharing contributing to understandings of dialogical art as research. This they argue is an increasingly necessary counterpoint to the reduction of practice-led fine art research to a training in mechanistic methods, reductive evaluation, and singular concrete outcomes aimed at satisfying the artist-researcher as customer and consumer.

KW - dialogue

KW - practice-led research

KW - generative method

KW - collaboration

KW - community of support

M3 - Conference proceeding

BT - Unknown Host Publication

PB - National Association of Fine Art Educators

ER -