TY - JOUR
T1 - The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice
T2 - A Q-Methodology study
AU - Rihtman, Tanya
AU - Morgan, Mike
AU - Booth, Julie
N1 - © 2024 the author(s). published by informa uK limited, trading as taylor & francis Group. this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. the terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
PY - 2024/8/18
Y1 - 2024/8/18
N2 - BackgroundPedagogically sound curricula are needed for occupational therapy (OT) students to adopt evidence-based practice (EBP) principles and internalise EBP within their professional identities. Exploring students’ perceptions of this knowledge area can contribute to effective curriculum design.Aims/ObjectivesTo explore the evolution of pre-registration OT student perceptions of research and EBP over the course of their engagement with undergraduate teaching and learning.Materials and methodsThe Q-sort approach synthesises different viewpoints regarding a sample of statements, using by-person factor analysis (respondents = variables; statements = sample). Final year pre-registration OT students completed the same Q-sort at three timepoints (pre-dissertation [n = 18]; post-dissertation submission [n = 12]; post-student research conference [n = 6]). Q-sort responses were intercorrelated and factor-analysed; extraction of factors with an eigenvalue of ¬>0.9 and varimax rotation identified majority viewpoints.ResultsSignificant factors were revealed at each timepoint: 1a: ‘Evidence–inseparable from OT practice’, 1b: ‘Research for research’s sake-inseparable from the occupational therapy identity’, 2: ‘Who am I to question the gurus?’, 3: ‘I can do it with confidence…but so what?’ConclusionsOpportunities for completing ‘authentic’ student research projects, with ‘ownership’ of results, may enhance research and EBP confidence and professional identity.SignificanceFindings expand current knowledge regarding effective use of pre-registration educational opportunities to support future research and EBP.
AB - BackgroundPedagogically sound curricula are needed for occupational therapy (OT) students to adopt evidence-based practice (EBP) principles and internalise EBP within their professional identities. Exploring students’ perceptions of this knowledge area can contribute to effective curriculum design.Aims/ObjectivesTo explore the evolution of pre-registration OT student perceptions of research and EBP over the course of their engagement with undergraduate teaching and learning.Materials and methodsThe Q-sort approach synthesises different viewpoints regarding a sample of statements, using by-person factor analysis (respondents = variables; statements = sample). Final year pre-registration OT students completed the same Q-sort at three timepoints (pre-dissertation [n = 18]; post-dissertation submission [n = 12]; post-student research conference [n = 6]). Q-sort responses were intercorrelated and factor-analysed; extraction of factors with an eigenvalue of ¬>0.9 and varimax rotation identified majority viewpoints.ResultsSignificant factors were revealed at each timepoint: 1a: ‘Evidence–inseparable from OT practice’, 1b: ‘Research for research’s sake-inseparable from the occupational therapy identity’, 2: ‘Who am I to question the gurus?’, 3: ‘I can do it with confidence…but so what?’ConclusionsOpportunities for completing ‘authentic’ student research projects, with ‘ownership’ of results, may enhance research and EBP confidence and professional identity.SignificanceFindings expand current knowledge regarding effective use of pre-registration educational opportunities to support future research and EBP.
KW - Attitudes
KW - Evidence based practice
KW - Occupational therapy
KW - Pedagogy
KW - Q-Methodology
KW - Research capability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201561777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/11038128.2024.2391318
DO - 10.1080/11038128.2024.2391318
M3 - Article
SN - 1103-8128
VL - 31
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 2391318
ER -