The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’

Denise Skinner, Graham Dietz, Antoinette Weibel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Trust is typically portrayed as beneficial to all concerned; something which is inherently good. In this article we focus on interpersonal trust and argue that, while there are undoubted benefits, trust can also be problematic; there are circumstances in which it can become a ‘poisoned chalice’ for one or other of the parties involved. We question whether the potential for negative experiences in relation to trust has been fully explored and argue that its true dark side lies within the dynamics of the trust relationship. From this stance we use the social exchange and gift giving literatures to re-appraise trust in a way that highlights the importance of expectation and intent and demonstrates the circumstances in which trust may not be beneficial for one of the parties involved. We conclude with a research agenda which we believe will further develop our understanding of this complex human interaction.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)206-224
    JournalOrganization
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    Interpersonal trust
    Interaction
    Social exchange
    Gift giving
    Research agenda

    Bibliographical note

    This paper is not yet available on the repository

    Keywords

    • Dark side of trust manipulation
    • trust and gift-giving
    • trust relationships
    • unwanted obligation

    Cite this

    The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. / Skinner, Denise; Dietz, Graham; Weibel, Antoinette.

    In: Organization, Vol. 21, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 206-224.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Skinner, Denise ; Dietz, Graham ; Weibel, Antoinette. / The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. In: Organization. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 206-224.
    @article{342d6fa703574455ac9ff149b15a2cd0,
    title = "The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’",
    abstract = "Trust is typically portrayed as beneficial to all concerned; something which is inherently good. In this article we focus on interpersonal trust and argue that, while there are undoubted benefits, trust can also be problematic; there are circumstances in which it can become a ‘poisoned chalice’ for one or other of the parties involved. We question whether the potential for negative experiences in relation to trust has been fully explored and argue that its true dark side lies within the dynamics of the trust relationship. From this stance we use the social exchange and gift giving literatures to re-appraise trust in a way that highlights the importance of expectation and intent and demonstrates the circumstances in which trust may not be beneficial for one of the parties involved. We conclude with a research agenda which we believe will further develop our understanding of this complex human interaction.",
    keywords = "Dark side of trust manipulation, trust and gift-giving, trust relationships, unwanted obligation",
    author = "Denise Skinner and Graham Dietz and Antoinette Weibel",
    note = "This paper is not yet available on the repository",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1177/1350508412473866",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "206--224",
    journal = "Organization",
    issn = "1350-5084",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’

    AU - Skinner, Denise

    AU - Dietz, Graham

    AU - Weibel, Antoinette

    N1 - This paper is not yet available on the repository

    PY - 2014/3

    Y1 - 2014/3

    N2 - Trust is typically portrayed as beneficial to all concerned; something which is inherently good. In this article we focus on interpersonal trust and argue that, while there are undoubted benefits, trust can also be problematic; there are circumstances in which it can become a ‘poisoned chalice’ for one or other of the parties involved. We question whether the potential for negative experiences in relation to trust has been fully explored and argue that its true dark side lies within the dynamics of the trust relationship. From this stance we use the social exchange and gift giving literatures to re-appraise trust in a way that highlights the importance of expectation and intent and demonstrates the circumstances in which trust may not be beneficial for one of the parties involved. We conclude with a research agenda which we believe will further develop our understanding of this complex human interaction.

    AB - Trust is typically portrayed as beneficial to all concerned; something which is inherently good. In this article we focus on interpersonal trust and argue that, while there are undoubted benefits, trust can also be problematic; there are circumstances in which it can become a ‘poisoned chalice’ for one or other of the parties involved. We question whether the potential for negative experiences in relation to trust has been fully explored and argue that its true dark side lies within the dynamics of the trust relationship. From this stance we use the social exchange and gift giving literatures to re-appraise trust in a way that highlights the importance of expectation and intent and demonstrates the circumstances in which trust may not be beneficial for one of the parties involved. We conclude with a research agenda which we believe will further develop our understanding of this complex human interaction.

    KW - Dark side of trust manipulation

    KW - trust and gift-giving

    KW - trust relationships

    KW - unwanted obligation

    U2 - 10.1177/1350508412473866

    DO - 10.1177/1350508412473866

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 206

    EP - 224

    JO - Organization

    JF - Organization

    SN - 1350-5084

    IS - 2

    ER -