The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control?

Amanze Ejiogu, Chibuzo Ejiogu, Ambisisi Ambituuni

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the dark side of transparency by problematizing the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) as a transparency, accountability and anti-corruption initiative in Nigeria. It does this by interrogating the underlying assumptions that transparency in the form of increased information disclosure inevitably leads to enhanced accountability and reduced corruption. Theoretic insights are drawn from the transparency literature as well as from the International Accounting Standards Board's framework for financial reporting. The findings enable a more nuanced understanding of transparency – where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to unintended outcomes. They show how increased information disclosure conceals and legitimises the weak and corrupt reporting systems and practices of government agencies. They highlight the importance of understandability of information disclosed as a key requirement of transparency. They illustrate that transparency is a complex social process by highlighting the means by which the government tries to gain control of the NEITI organisation and how NEITI's ability to operate effectively is dependent on the political will of the government in power. The findings also demonstrate that the instrument through which transparency is enacted is itself a central actor in the transparency process as historical corruption within the NEITI bureaucracy as well as the opacity of NEITI as an organisation lead to outcomes of distrust, uncertainty and doubt amongst NEITIs target audience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages(In-Press)
Volume(In-Press)
Specialist publicationBritish Accounting Review
PublisherAcademic Press
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

corruption
transparency
Nigeria
responsibility
industry
reporting system
government agency
social process
bureaucracy
uncertainty

Cite this

The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control? / Ejiogu, Amanze; Ejiogu, Chibuzo; Ambituuni, Ambisisi.

In: British Accounting Review, Vol. (In-Press), 16.10.2018, p. (In-Press).

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

@misc{e7ff3b0d71784495ba92bded1a992533,
title = "The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control?",
abstract = "This study explores the dark side of transparency by problematizing the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) as a transparency, accountability and anti-corruption initiative in Nigeria. It does this by interrogating the underlying assumptions that transparency in the form of increased information disclosure inevitably leads to enhanced accountability and reduced corruption. Theoretic insights are drawn from the transparency literature as well as from the International Accounting Standards Board's framework for financial reporting. The findings enable a more nuanced understanding of transparency – where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to unintended outcomes. They show how increased information disclosure conceals and legitimises the weak and corrupt reporting systems and practices of government agencies. They highlight the importance of understandability of information disclosed as a key requirement of transparency. They illustrate that transparency is a complex social process by highlighting the means by which the government tries to gain control of the NEITI organisation and how NEITI's ability to operate effectively is dependent on the political will of the government in power. The findings also demonstrate that the instrument through which transparency is enacted is itself a central actor in the transparency process as historical corruption within the NEITI bureaucracy as well as the opacity of NEITI as an organisation lead to outcomes of distrust, uncertainty and doubt amongst NEITIs target audience.",
author = "Amanze Ejiogu and Chibuzo Ejiogu and Ambisisi Ambituuni",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2018.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "(In-Press)",
pages = "(In--Press)",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control?

AU - Ejiogu, Amanze

AU - Ejiogu, Chibuzo

AU - Ambituuni, Ambisisi

PY - 2018/10/16

Y1 - 2018/10/16

N2 - This study explores the dark side of transparency by problematizing the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) as a transparency, accountability and anti-corruption initiative in Nigeria. It does this by interrogating the underlying assumptions that transparency in the form of increased information disclosure inevitably leads to enhanced accountability and reduced corruption. Theoretic insights are drawn from the transparency literature as well as from the International Accounting Standards Board's framework for financial reporting. The findings enable a more nuanced understanding of transparency – where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to unintended outcomes. They show how increased information disclosure conceals and legitimises the weak and corrupt reporting systems and practices of government agencies. They highlight the importance of understandability of information disclosed as a key requirement of transparency. They illustrate that transparency is a complex social process by highlighting the means by which the government tries to gain control of the NEITI organisation and how NEITI's ability to operate effectively is dependent on the political will of the government in power. The findings also demonstrate that the instrument through which transparency is enacted is itself a central actor in the transparency process as historical corruption within the NEITI bureaucracy as well as the opacity of NEITI as an organisation lead to outcomes of distrust, uncertainty and doubt amongst NEITIs target audience.

AB - This study explores the dark side of transparency by problematizing the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) as a transparency, accountability and anti-corruption initiative in Nigeria. It does this by interrogating the underlying assumptions that transparency in the form of increased information disclosure inevitably leads to enhanced accountability and reduced corruption. Theoretic insights are drawn from the transparency literature as well as from the International Accounting Standards Board's framework for financial reporting. The findings enable a more nuanced understanding of transparency – where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to unintended outcomes. They show how increased information disclosure conceals and legitimises the weak and corrupt reporting systems and practices of government agencies. They highlight the importance of understandability of information disclosed as a key requirement of transparency. They illustrate that transparency is a complex social process by highlighting the means by which the government tries to gain control of the NEITI organisation and how NEITI's ability to operate effectively is dependent on the political will of the government in power. The findings also demonstrate that the instrument through which transparency is enacted is itself a central actor in the transparency process as historical corruption within the NEITI bureaucracy as well as the opacity of NEITI as an organisation lead to outcomes of distrust, uncertainty and doubt amongst NEITIs target audience.

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2018.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2018.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - (In-Press)

SP - (In-Press)

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

PB - Academic Press

ER -