The Committee on World Food Security: Politics under threat

Jessica Duncan, Lambek Nadia, Priscilla Claeys

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The reform of the UN’s Committee on World Food Security (CFS) in 2009 was widely regarded as a key moment in the re-organization of global food security governance processes. This was due to the implementation of a novel approach to participation of “stakeholders”, and an explicit commitment to advancing human rights and prioritizing the voices of those most affected by hunger and food insecurity. The reformed CFS is part of a broader architecture of global food security governance that is increasingly anti-political: that is, it is increasingly organized in ways that minimise, avoid, or conceal the relations of power and conflictual dimensions inherent to complex and normative policy processes and reflective of the antagonisms inherent in human society. Through the reform process, we argue that the CFS has emerged as a forum where politics can, and do, play out. To arrive at this conclusion, in this chapter we introduce a critical political analytic framework before introducing the reform of the CFS. We review the CFS’s six reform roles and introduce the CFS negotiation process as an example of political practice. We then examine three challenges that threaten to depoliticise the CFS. These include: (1) changes in qualifications for participants that have resulted in a rebalancing of participation between the private sector and civil society; (2) a shift away from plenary negotiations to intersessional negotiations; and, (3) changes in the role of human rights at the CFS. The chapter concludes by making a case for supporting the CFS as a political committee.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUn monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle
Place of PublicationParis
PublisherPresses de Sciences-Po, Paris
Pages(in press)
Volume(in press)
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

threat
food
reform
politics
human rights
governance
participation
nutrition situation
antagonism
hunger
reorganization
qualification
civil society
private sector
UNO
stakeholder
commitment
Society

Keywords

  • food security, global governance, participation, policy, Committee on World Food Security, politics, anti-politics

Cite this

Duncan, J., Nadia, L., & Claeys, P. (Accepted/In press). The Committee on World Food Security: Politics under threat. In Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle (Vol. (in press), pp. (in press)). Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris.

The Committee on World Food Security : Politics under threat. / Duncan, Jessica; Nadia, Lambek; Claeys, Priscilla.

Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle. Vol. (in press) Paris : Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris, 2017. p. (in press).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Duncan, J, Nadia, L & Claeys, P 2017, The Committee on World Food Security: Politics under threat. in Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle. vol. (in press), Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris, Paris, pp. (in press).
Duncan J, Nadia L, Claeys P. The Committee on World Food Security: Politics under threat. In Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle. Vol. (in press). Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris. 2017. p. (in press)
Duncan, Jessica ; Nadia, Lambek ; Claeys, Priscilla. / The Committee on World Food Security : Politics under threat. Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle. Vol. (in press) Paris : Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris, 2017. pp. (in press)
@inbook{b09d0193fd7b4c7191390c1b2cbc70b8,
title = "The Committee on World Food Security: Politics under threat",
abstract = "The reform of the UN’s Committee on World Food Security (CFS) in 2009 was widely regarded as a key moment in the re-organization of global food security governance processes. This was due to the implementation of a novel approach to participation of “stakeholders”, and an explicit commitment to advancing human rights and prioritizing the voices of those most affected by hunger and food insecurity. The reformed CFS is part of a broader architecture of global food security governance that is increasingly anti-political: that is, it is increasingly organized in ways that minimise, avoid, or conceal the relations of power and conflictual dimensions inherent to complex and normative policy processes and reflective of the antagonisms inherent in human society. Through the reform process, we argue that the CFS has emerged as a forum where politics can, and do, play out. To arrive at this conclusion, in this chapter we introduce a critical political analytic framework before introducing the reform of the CFS. We review the CFS’s six reform roles and introduce the CFS negotiation process as an example of political practice. We then examine three challenges that threaten to depoliticise the CFS. These include: (1) changes in qualifications for participants that have resulted in a rebalancing of participation between the private sector and civil society; (2) a shift away from plenary negotiations to intersessional negotiations; and, (3) changes in the role of human rights at the CFS. The chapter concludes by making a case for supporting the CFS as a political committee.",
keywords = "food security, global governance, participation, policy, Committee on World Food Security, politics, anti-politics",
author = "Jessica Duncan and Lambek Nadia and Priscilla Claeys",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "(in press)",
pages = "(in press)",
booktitle = "Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la s{\'e}curit{\'e} alimentaire au 21e si{\`e}cle",
publisher = "Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Committee on World Food Security

T2 - Politics under threat

AU - Duncan, Jessica

AU - Nadia, Lambek

AU - Claeys, Priscilla

PY - 2017/12/15

Y1 - 2017/12/15

N2 - The reform of the UN’s Committee on World Food Security (CFS) in 2009 was widely regarded as a key moment in the re-organization of global food security governance processes. This was due to the implementation of a novel approach to participation of “stakeholders”, and an explicit commitment to advancing human rights and prioritizing the voices of those most affected by hunger and food insecurity. The reformed CFS is part of a broader architecture of global food security governance that is increasingly anti-political: that is, it is increasingly organized in ways that minimise, avoid, or conceal the relations of power and conflictual dimensions inherent to complex and normative policy processes and reflective of the antagonisms inherent in human society. Through the reform process, we argue that the CFS has emerged as a forum where politics can, and do, play out. To arrive at this conclusion, in this chapter we introduce a critical political analytic framework before introducing the reform of the CFS. We review the CFS’s six reform roles and introduce the CFS negotiation process as an example of political practice. We then examine three challenges that threaten to depoliticise the CFS. These include: (1) changes in qualifications for participants that have resulted in a rebalancing of participation between the private sector and civil society; (2) a shift away from plenary negotiations to intersessional negotiations; and, (3) changes in the role of human rights at the CFS. The chapter concludes by making a case for supporting the CFS as a political committee.

AB - The reform of the UN’s Committee on World Food Security (CFS) in 2009 was widely regarded as a key moment in the re-organization of global food security governance processes. This was due to the implementation of a novel approach to participation of “stakeholders”, and an explicit commitment to advancing human rights and prioritizing the voices of those most affected by hunger and food insecurity. The reformed CFS is part of a broader architecture of global food security governance that is increasingly anti-political: that is, it is increasingly organized in ways that minimise, avoid, or conceal the relations of power and conflictual dimensions inherent to complex and normative policy processes and reflective of the antagonisms inherent in human society. Through the reform process, we argue that the CFS has emerged as a forum where politics can, and do, play out. To arrive at this conclusion, in this chapter we introduce a critical political analytic framework before introducing the reform of the CFS. We review the CFS’s six reform roles and introduce the CFS negotiation process as an example of political practice. We then examine three challenges that threaten to depoliticise the CFS. These include: (1) changes in qualifications for participants that have resulted in a rebalancing of participation between the private sector and civil society; (2) a shift away from plenary negotiations to intersessional negotiations; and, (3) changes in the role of human rights at the CFS. The chapter concludes by making a case for supporting the CFS as a political committee.

KW - food security, global governance, participation, policy, Committee on World Food Security, politics, anti-politics

M3 - Chapter

VL - (in press)

SP - (in press)

BT - Un monde sans faim? Gouverner la sécurité alimentaire au 21e siècle

PB - Presses de Sciences-Po, Paris

CY - Paris

ER -