The Case for Supermajority Requirements in Referendums

Matt Qvortrup, Leah Trueblood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
351 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Referendums appear to be the most majoritarian of democratic processes. The simplicity and equality they offer through voting look like the essence of majoritarianism. Indeed, this simplicity and equality are often argued to be central to referendums’ appeal. This article argues that this appearance of majoritarianism is misleading. Paradoxically, without supermajority requirements, binding referendums on constitutional issues cannot offer the simplicity and equality majoritarianism requires. This article identifies three different types of majority requirements and where and when these requirements are used worldwide. It then demonstrates why, at least for binding referendums on constitutional questions, special majority requirements are necessary to maintain the principles of majoritarianism. It shows that there is always a case for turnout thresholds in referendums and further special majority requirements depending on the context. Finally, the article argues that the case for special majority requirements can be context-dependent without collapsing into indeterminacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-204
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Funder

British Academy

Keywords

  • Referendums
  • Constitutions
  • Democracy
  • Majority-Requirements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Case for Supermajority Requirements in Referendums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this