The Application of Aeronautical Decision-making Support Systems for Improving Pilots' Performance in Flight Operations

Wen-Chin Li, Lun-Wen Li, Don Harris, Yueh-Ling Hsu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Operating a high-technology commercial airliner is not only an issue in psychomotor skill performance but also of a real-time decision-making involving situation awareness and risk management within a limited-time condition. The number of aircraft accidents attributable solely to mechanical failures has decreased markedly in recent years, but the contribution of human error has declined at a much slower rate. Previous research demonstrated a belief rule-based decision support system has provided more reliable and informative performance after training. The purpose of this research was to identify the best mnemonic-based method of decision support systems for improving commercial pilot's performance in the advanced cockpit. A total of 157 airline pilots, all qualified on the Boeing 747-400 evaluated the suitability of four different ADM methods: SHOR (Stimuli, Hypotheses, Options, Response); PASS (Problem identification, Acquire information, Survey strategy, Select strategy); FORDEC (Facts, Options, Risks & Benefits, Decision, Execution, Check); and DESIDE (Detect, Estimate, Set safety objectives, Identify, Do, Evaluate). Each was evaluated for six different types of decisions: go/no go; recognition-primed; response selection; resource management; non-diagnostic procedural; and creative problem-solving. Pilots regarded the FORDEC methodology as being the best in all decision-making scenarios, irrespective of the time available to make the decision. It was also rated as the best ADM method for promoting crew coordination. However, it was advised that practicing the FORDEC mnemonic in flight simulator was important before attempting to apply it in a real life situation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)114-123
    JournalJournal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation
    Volume46
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Fingerprint

    Delta modulation
    Decision support systems
    Decision making
    Aircraft accidents
    Flight simulators
    Risk management

    Bibliographical note

    This article is not yet available on the repository

    Keywords

    • Aeronautical decision-making
    • Human factors in aviation
    • Mnemonic-based training
    • Situational awareness

    Cite this

    The Application of Aeronautical Decision-making Support Systems for Improving Pilots' Performance in Flight Operations. / Li, Wen-Chin; Li, Lun-Wen; Harris, Don; Hsu, Yueh-Ling.

    In: Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Vol. 46, No. 2, 06.2014, p. 114-123.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{8a4ff59e1dd048ceb2d949a26398721b,
    title = "The Application of Aeronautical Decision-making Support Systems for Improving Pilots' Performance in Flight Operations",
    abstract = "Operating a high-technology commercial airliner is not only an issue in psychomotor skill performance but also of a real-time decision-making involving situation awareness and risk management within a limited-time condition. The number of aircraft accidents attributable solely to mechanical failures has decreased markedly in recent years, but the contribution of human error has declined at a much slower rate. Previous research demonstrated a belief rule-based decision support system has provided more reliable and informative performance after training. The purpose of this research was to identify the best mnemonic-based method of decision support systems for improving commercial pilot's performance in the advanced cockpit. A total of 157 airline pilots, all qualified on the Boeing 747-400 evaluated the suitability of four different ADM methods: SHOR (Stimuli, Hypotheses, Options, Response); PASS (Problem identification, Acquire information, Survey strategy, Select strategy); FORDEC (Facts, Options, Risks & Benefits, Decision, Execution, Check); and DESIDE (Detect, Estimate, Set safety objectives, Identify, Do, Evaluate). Each was evaluated for six different types of decisions: go/no go; recognition-primed; response selection; resource management; non-diagnostic procedural; and creative problem-solving. Pilots regarded the FORDEC methodology as being the best in all decision-making scenarios, irrespective of the time available to make the decision. It was also rated as the best ADM method for promoting crew coordination. However, it was advised that practicing the FORDEC mnemonic in flight simulator was important before attempting to apply it in a real life situation.",
    keywords = "Aeronautical decision-making, Human factors in aviation, Mnemonic-based training, Situational awareness",
    author = "Wen-Chin Li and Lun-Wen Li and Don Harris and Yueh-Ling Hsu",
    note = "This article is not yet available on the repository",
    year = "2014",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.6125/14-0324-789",
    language = "English",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "114--123",
    journal = "Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A",
    issn = "1990-7710",
    publisher = "The Aeronautical and Astronautical Society of the Republic of China",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Application of Aeronautical Decision-making Support Systems for Improving Pilots' Performance in Flight Operations

    AU - Li, Wen-Chin

    AU - Li, Lun-Wen

    AU - Harris, Don

    AU - Hsu, Yueh-Ling

    N1 - This article is not yet available on the repository

    PY - 2014/6

    Y1 - 2014/6

    N2 - Operating a high-technology commercial airliner is not only an issue in psychomotor skill performance but also of a real-time decision-making involving situation awareness and risk management within a limited-time condition. The number of aircraft accidents attributable solely to mechanical failures has decreased markedly in recent years, but the contribution of human error has declined at a much slower rate. Previous research demonstrated a belief rule-based decision support system has provided more reliable and informative performance after training. The purpose of this research was to identify the best mnemonic-based method of decision support systems for improving commercial pilot's performance in the advanced cockpit. A total of 157 airline pilots, all qualified on the Boeing 747-400 evaluated the suitability of four different ADM methods: SHOR (Stimuli, Hypotheses, Options, Response); PASS (Problem identification, Acquire information, Survey strategy, Select strategy); FORDEC (Facts, Options, Risks & Benefits, Decision, Execution, Check); and DESIDE (Detect, Estimate, Set safety objectives, Identify, Do, Evaluate). Each was evaluated for six different types of decisions: go/no go; recognition-primed; response selection; resource management; non-diagnostic procedural; and creative problem-solving. Pilots regarded the FORDEC methodology as being the best in all decision-making scenarios, irrespective of the time available to make the decision. It was also rated as the best ADM method for promoting crew coordination. However, it was advised that practicing the FORDEC mnemonic in flight simulator was important before attempting to apply it in a real life situation.

    AB - Operating a high-technology commercial airliner is not only an issue in psychomotor skill performance but also of a real-time decision-making involving situation awareness and risk management within a limited-time condition. The number of aircraft accidents attributable solely to mechanical failures has decreased markedly in recent years, but the contribution of human error has declined at a much slower rate. Previous research demonstrated a belief rule-based decision support system has provided more reliable and informative performance after training. The purpose of this research was to identify the best mnemonic-based method of decision support systems for improving commercial pilot's performance in the advanced cockpit. A total of 157 airline pilots, all qualified on the Boeing 747-400 evaluated the suitability of four different ADM methods: SHOR (Stimuli, Hypotheses, Options, Response); PASS (Problem identification, Acquire information, Survey strategy, Select strategy); FORDEC (Facts, Options, Risks & Benefits, Decision, Execution, Check); and DESIDE (Detect, Estimate, Set safety objectives, Identify, Do, Evaluate). Each was evaluated for six different types of decisions: go/no go; recognition-primed; response selection; resource management; non-diagnostic procedural; and creative problem-solving. Pilots regarded the FORDEC methodology as being the best in all decision-making scenarios, irrespective of the time available to make the decision. It was also rated as the best ADM method for promoting crew coordination. However, it was advised that practicing the FORDEC mnemonic in flight simulator was important before attempting to apply it in a real life situation.

    KW - Aeronautical decision-making

    KW - Human factors in aviation

    KW - Mnemonic-based training

    KW - Situational awareness

    U2 - 10.6125/14-0324-789

    DO - 10.6125/14-0324-789

    M3 - Article

    VL - 46

    SP - 114

    EP - 123

    JO - Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A

    JF - Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A

    SN - 1990-7710

    IS - 2

    ER -