This chapter examines the principles underpinning the UK Government’s tax and benefit design in response to COVID-19. Since 2010, a central theme underpinning tax and benefit design has been the avoidance of fraud. For those seeking to receive benefits in the UK, this has resulted in a focus on benefits eligibility as opposed to immediacy of need. Consequently, throughout the last decade, this restrictive approach to the receipt of benefits has negatively impacted the enjoyment of the right to social security. COVID-19 has, however, challenged these underpinnings and the UK Government’s COVID-19 financial support packages have paid less heed to the need to avoid fraud. Rather, the immediacy of need triumphed. Consequently, during COVID-19 the financial support policies which were made available were less restrictive and more generous than existing social security provision. From the perspective of the right to social security, this shift must be praised. The pandemic, therefore, offers the potential to powerfully rebut the assumptions upon which a decade of social security austerity has been founded. In turn, the cruciality of social security in response to the pandemic may contribute to improved social security structures in the UK and the right to social security can serve as an important yardstick in informing our future social security structures.
|Title of host publication
|Global Pandemic, Security and Human Rights
|Subtitle of host publication
|Comparative Explorations of COVID-19 and the Law
|Ben Stanford, Steve Foster, Carlos Espaliu Berdud
|Published - 29 Dec 2021
Bibliographical notePublisher: Routledge
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
ASJC Scopus subject areas