Abstract
In this paper, we look at a specific issue with practical Turing tests, namely the right of the machine to remain silent during interrogation. In particular, we consider the possibility of a machine passing the Turing test simply by not saying anything. We include a number of transcripts from practical Turing tests in which silence has actually occurred on the part of a hidden entity. Each of the transcripts considered here resulted in a judge being unable to make the ‘right identification’, i.e., they could not say for certain which hidden entity was the machine.
Publisher statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence on 7th January 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0952813X.2015.1132273
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 287-297 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence |
Volume | 29 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Jan 2016 |
Bibliographical note
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence on 7th January 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0952813X.2015.1132273Keywords
- Deception detection
- natural language
- Turing’s imitation game
- chatbots
- machine misidentification