Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe

W. Barton, A. Beck

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    19 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The paper consists of an argument for the adoption of an aggressive postmodernism that opposes materialism, monism, and the supremacy of scientific reason as fundamentally outdated twentieth century notions. It attacks the models of planning, strategy, and experience as hopelessly Fordist anachronisms and posits a turn away from scientistic understanding towards visionary motivation. What Postmodernism means: • the downgrading of science • the resurrection of religion • coming to terms with the Death of Man • the futility of strategy • opposition to Culture and to Cultural Studies Such an aggressive postmodernism can have no respect for the notion of Culture, which is in thrall to that of the Human. In a world comprised principally of information, the privileged position of the human species and indeed of awareness itself is undermined. Academic obsession with post-s has resulted in little real sense of what is ‘before’ and what is ‘after’. Bogus chronologies abound. Whereas the study of Communication and of Culture have been considered to be largely the same, we contend that they are actively opposed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMass media: International issues
    EditorsA. Arampatsis, Y. Passadeos
    Place of PublicationAthens
    PublisherATINER
    Pages295-304
    ISBN (Print)9608867282
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Continental
    Postmodernism
    Communication
    Safety
    Monism
    Chronology
    Resurrection
    Religion
    Materialism
    Planning
    Supremacy
    Attack
    Anachronism
    Obsessions

    Keywords

    • communication
    • culture
    • postmodernism

    Cite this

    Barton, W., & Beck, A. (2005). Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe. In A. Arampatsis, & Y. Passadeos (Eds.), Mass media: International issues (pp. 295-304). Athens: ATINER.

    Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe. / Barton, W.; Beck, A.

    Mass media: International issues. ed. / A. Arampatsis; Y. Passadeos. Athens : ATINER, 2005. p. 295-304.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Barton, W & Beck, A 2005, Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe. in A Arampatsis & Y Passadeos (eds), Mass media: International issues. ATINER, Athens, pp. 295-304.
    Barton W, Beck A. Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe. In Arampatsis A, Passadeos Y, editors, Mass media: International issues. Athens: ATINER. 2005. p. 295-304
    Barton, W. ; Beck, A. / Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe. Mass media: International issues. editor / A. Arampatsis ; Y. Passadeos. Athens : ATINER, 2005. pp. 295-304
    @inbook{e674d622c9a04bf491553b69b2e73161,
    title = "Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe",
    abstract = "The paper consists of an argument for the adoption of an aggressive postmodernism that opposes materialism, monism, and the supremacy of scientific reason as fundamentally outdated twentieth century notions. It attacks the models of planning, strategy, and experience as hopelessly Fordist anachronisms and posits a turn away from scientistic understanding towards visionary motivation. What Postmodernism means: • the downgrading of science • the resurrection of religion • coming to terms with the Death of Man • the futility of strategy • opposition to Culture and to Cultural Studies Such an aggressive postmodernism can have no respect for the notion of Culture, which is in thrall to that of the Human. In a world comprised principally of information, the privileged position of the human species and indeed of awareness itself is undermined. Academic obsession with post-s has resulted in little real sense of what is ‘before’ and what is ‘after’. Bogus chronologies abound. Whereas the study of Communication and of Culture have been considered to be largely the same, we contend that they are actively opposed.",
    keywords = "communication, culture, postmodernism",
    author = "W. Barton and A. Beck",
    year = "2005",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9608867282",
    pages = "295--304",
    editor = "A. Arampatsis and Y. Passadeos",
    booktitle = "Mass media: International issues",
    publisher = "ATINER",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Taking off the safety catch: communication and culture in the Anglosphere and Continental Europe

    AU - Barton, W.

    AU - Beck, A.

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - The paper consists of an argument for the adoption of an aggressive postmodernism that opposes materialism, monism, and the supremacy of scientific reason as fundamentally outdated twentieth century notions. It attacks the models of planning, strategy, and experience as hopelessly Fordist anachronisms and posits a turn away from scientistic understanding towards visionary motivation. What Postmodernism means: • the downgrading of science • the resurrection of religion • coming to terms with the Death of Man • the futility of strategy • opposition to Culture and to Cultural Studies Such an aggressive postmodernism can have no respect for the notion of Culture, which is in thrall to that of the Human. In a world comprised principally of information, the privileged position of the human species and indeed of awareness itself is undermined. Academic obsession with post-s has resulted in little real sense of what is ‘before’ and what is ‘after’. Bogus chronologies abound. Whereas the study of Communication and of Culture have been considered to be largely the same, we contend that they are actively opposed.

    AB - The paper consists of an argument for the adoption of an aggressive postmodernism that opposes materialism, monism, and the supremacy of scientific reason as fundamentally outdated twentieth century notions. It attacks the models of planning, strategy, and experience as hopelessly Fordist anachronisms and posits a turn away from scientistic understanding towards visionary motivation. What Postmodernism means: • the downgrading of science • the resurrection of religion • coming to terms with the Death of Man • the futility of strategy • opposition to Culture and to Cultural Studies Such an aggressive postmodernism can have no respect for the notion of Culture, which is in thrall to that of the Human. In a world comprised principally of information, the privileged position of the human species and indeed of awareness itself is undermined. Academic obsession with post-s has resulted in little real sense of what is ‘before’ and what is ‘after’. Bogus chronologies abound. Whereas the study of Communication and of Culture have been considered to be largely the same, we contend that they are actively opposed.

    KW - communication

    KW - culture

    KW - postmodernism

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9608867282

    SP - 295

    EP - 304

    BT - Mass media: International issues

    A2 - Arampatsis, A.

    A2 - Passadeos, Y.

    PB - ATINER

    CY - Athens

    ER -