“Take Back Control of Our Borders”: The Role of Arguments about Controlling Immigration in the Brexit Debate

Simon Goodman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In the run-up to Brexit, the British referendum on leaving the European Union (EU), immigration was one of the top issues of concern to voters. Discussions about immigration dominated the campaigns, with the “Vote Leave” campaign linking leaving the EU with the opportunity to prevent immigration into the United Kingdom (UK). The focus on this was in part due to the migration and ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe that coincided with the referendum. This paper presents an analysis of how the key players in the Brexit debate focused on immigration. The question is, therefore, how did the participants in the Brexit debate talk about immigration and what did this talk accomplish. Discourse analysis of campaign coverage reveals that: 1. Leave campaigners presented immigration as out of control, including that from within and outside of the EU and those arriving in Europe as refugees; 2. “Remain” campaigners presented Brexit as an ineffective way of controlling migration;
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-53
    Number of pages18
    JournalYearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    Early online date4 Dec 2017
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“Take Back Control of Our Borders”: The Role of Arguments about Controlling Immigration in the Brexit Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this