Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste

R. Ashley; D. Blackwood; N. Souter; S. Hendry; J. Moir; J. Dunkerley; John W. Davies; D. Butler; A. Cook; J. Conlin; M. Squibbs; A. Britton; P. Goldie

doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)

Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste

R. Ashley, D. Blackwood, N. Souter, S. Hendry, J. Moir, J. Dunkerley, John W. Davies, D. Butler, A. Cook, J. Conlin, M. Squibbs, A. Britton, P. Goldie

College of Engineering, Environment & Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned. - See more at: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A2%28206%29#sthash.hoOS5UnX.dpuf

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	206-215
Journal	Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume	131
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)
Publication status	Published - 2005

Bibliographical note

The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

Keywords

waste disposal
sanitary sewers
decision making
social factors
benefit cost ratios
solid wastes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)

http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?0500842

Cite this

@article{25e36e56e3774b60a61cc38a104966a1,

title = "Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste",

abstract = "The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned. - See more at: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A2%28206%29#sthash.hoOS5UnX.dpuf",

keywords = "waste disposal, sanitary sewers, decision making, social factors, benefit cost ratios, solid wastes",

author = "R. Ashley and D. Blackwood and N. Souter and S. Hendry and J. Moir and J. Dunkerley and Davies, {John W.} and D. Butler and A. Cook and J. Conlin and M. Squibbs and A. Britton and P. Goldie",

note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository.",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)",

language = "English",

volume = "131",

pages = "206--215",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering",

issn = "0733-9372",

publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste

AU - Ashley, R.

AU - Blackwood, D.

AU - Souter, N.

AU - Hendry, S.

AU - Moir, J.

AU - Dunkerley, J.

AU - Davies, John W.

AU - Butler, D.

AU - Cook, A.

AU - Conlin, J.

AU - Squibbs, M.

AU - Britton, A.

AU - Goldie, P.

N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned. - See more at: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A2%28206%29#sthash.hoOS5UnX.dpuf

AB - The study presented is an example of the assessment of the relative sustainability of either option for disposal of domestic sanitary waste, either via the toilet or via the solid waste route. This required an evaluation of the total (social, economic, environmental, and technical) benefit/cost of implementing and adopting the alternative routes and an assessment of public responsiveness to encouragement to change sanitary waste disposal practices. It illustrates how, even for an apparently straightforward either/or question, the assessment of relative sustainability is complex and the amount of data needed to quantify sustainability indicators is prodigious. The study also provides an appraisal of the effectiveness of public campaigns to reduce waterborne disposal. Important information regarding public attitude and behavior in relation to wastewater systems has been acquired and lessons for ways of encouraging behavioral change to more sustainable ways of living have been gleaned. - See more at: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9372%282005%29131%3A2%28206%29#sthash.hoOS5UnX.dpuf

KW - waste disposal

KW - sanitary sewers

KW - decision making

KW - social factors

KW - benefit cost ratios

KW - solid wastes

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)

M3 - Article

SN - 0733-9372

SN - 1943-7870

VL - 131

SP - 206

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering

JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering

IS - 2

ER -

Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this