Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit

Joseph C Manning, Pippa Hemingway, Sarah A Redsell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96% of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(in press)
Number of pages23
JournalNursing in critical care
Volume(in press)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pediatric Intensive Care Units
Survivors
Referral and Consultation
Research
Health Services Research
Exercise
Aftercare
Critical Care
Focus Groups
Critical Illness
Caregivers
Siblings
Young Adult
Parents
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health
Wounds and Injuries

Cite this

Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit. / Manning, Joseph C; Hemingway, Pippa; Redsell, Sarah A.

In: Nursing in critical care, Vol. (in press), 17.05.2017, p. (in press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manning, Joseph C ; Hemingway, Pippa ; Redsell, Sarah A. / Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit. In: Nursing in critical care. 2017 ; Vol. (in press). pp. (in press).
@article{3dcbb248b2fe4bc28d278efe3ee3eb50,
title = "Survived so what?: Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit",
abstract = "The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96{\%} of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.",
author = "Manning, {Joseph C} and Pippa Hemingway and Redsell, {Sarah A}",
note = "{\circledC} 2017 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/nicc.12298",
language = "English",
volume = "(in press)",
pages = "(in press)",
journal = "Nursing in critical care",
issn = "1362-1017",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survived so what?

T2 - Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit

AU - Manning, Joseph C

AU - Hemingway, Pippa

AU - Redsell, Sarah A

N1 - © 2017 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.

PY - 2017/5/17

Y1 - 2017/5/17

N2 - The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96% of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.

AB - The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96% of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.

U2 - 10.1111/nicc.12298

DO - 10.1111/nicc.12298

M3 - Article

VL - (in press)

SP - (in press)

JO - Nursing in critical care

JF - Nursing in critical care

SN - 1362-1017

ER -