Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition.

Miguel Farias, Valerie van Mulukom, Guy Kahane, Ute Kreplin, Anna Joyce, Pedro Soares, Lluis Oviedo, Mathilde Hernu, Karolina Rokita, Julian Savulescu, Riikka Möttönen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)
    87 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    According to the Intuitive Belief Hypothesis, supernatural belief relies heavily on intuitive thinking—and decreases when analytic thinking is engaged. After pointing out various limitations in prior attempts to support this Intuitive Belief Hypothesis, we test it across three new studies using a variety of paradigms, ranging from a pilgrimage field study to a neurostimulation experiment. In all three studies, we found no relationship between intuitive or analytical thinking and supernatural belief. We conclude that it is premature to explain belief in gods as ‘intuitive’, and that other factors, such as socio-cultural upbringing, are likely to play a greater role in the emergence and maintenance of supernatural belief than cognitive style.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number15100
    JournalScientific Reports
    Volume7
    Early online date8 Nov 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this