Abstract
Purpose
This practitioner-oriented research paper aims to identify, describe and evaluate the different ways in which formal collective change agency is structured in specialist units inside diverse organisations.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a qualitative design, exploratory interview and case study research was conducted in organisations across the UK public and private sectors to explore how different change agency units operate within organisational structures.
Findings
Four dominant types of internal change agency unit are identified, varying in terms of their change impact scope and degree of structural embeddedness in the organisation. These units are described as Transformers, Enforcers, Specialists and Independents (TESI) and share key concerns with securing client credibility and added value, effective relationship management and the use of consulting tools. Their roles and the tensions they experience are outlined along with hybrid forms and dynamic shifts from one type to another.
Research limitations/implications
The study could be extended outside of the UK and conducted longitudinally to help identify outcomes more precisely in relation to context.
Practical implications
Each of the four types of change agency unit identified is shown to be suited to certain conditions and to present particular challenges for collective change agency and for specialist management occupations engaged in such work. The analysis could usefully inform organisation design decisions around internal change agency.
Originality/value
We extend debates around the nature of internal change agency which has typically focused on comparisons with external change agents at the level of the individual. Developing the work of Caldwell (2003), we reveal how emergent, team-based or collective approaches to change agency can be formalised, rather than informal, and that structural considerations of change need to be considered along with traditional concerns with change management.
This practitioner-oriented research paper aims to identify, describe and evaluate the different ways in which formal collective change agency is structured in specialist units inside diverse organisations.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a qualitative design, exploratory interview and case study research was conducted in organisations across the UK public and private sectors to explore how different change agency units operate within organisational structures.
Findings
Four dominant types of internal change agency unit are identified, varying in terms of their change impact scope and degree of structural embeddedness in the organisation. These units are described as Transformers, Enforcers, Specialists and Independents (TESI) and share key concerns with securing client credibility and added value, effective relationship management and the use of consulting tools. Their roles and the tensions they experience are outlined along with hybrid forms and dynamic shifts from one type to another.
Research limitations/implications
The study could be extended outside of the UK and conducted longitudinally to help identify outcomes more precisely in relation to context.
Practical implications
Each of the four types of change agency unit identified is shown to be suited to certain conditions and to present particular challenges for collective change agency and for specialist management occupations engaged in such work. The analysis could usefully inform organisation design decisions around internal change agency.
Originality/value
We extend debates around the nature of internal change agency which has typically focused on comparisons with external change agents at the level of the individual. Developing the work of Caldwell (2003), we reveal how emergent, team-based or collective approaches to change agency can be formalised, rather than informal, and that structural considerations of change need to be considered along with traditional concerns with change management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-328 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Employee Relations |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Feb 2018 |
Bibliographical note
© Emerald Publishing Limited 2018Published by Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.