Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students

Neil Gopee, Mary Deane

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Students develop better academic writing skills as they progress through their higher education programme, but despite recent continuing monitoring of student satisfaction with their education in UK, there has been relatively little research into students' perceptions of the active support that they need and receive to succeed as academic writers. Aim of the study: To examine the strategies that university students on health or social care courses utilise to develop as writers in the face of many pressures and demands from different sources. Research method used: Qualitative research conducted at a British University into undergraduates' writing practices in the field of healthcare. Ten participants took part in semi-structured interviews, half of whom were international students. The data was analysed by the researchers from the field of writing development using thematic analysis. Results: The main findings are that certain students struggle as academic writers if they do not receive tuition on appropriate and effective academic writing through institutional provisions, or through non-institutional strategies, that can promote success with the writing process. There is also uncertainty over the extent to which nurse educators are expected to teach academic writing skills, alongside their discipline-specific subject areas. Conclusions: Both institutional provisions for academic writing development, such as a dedicated writing support department, and non-institutional factors such as peer-collaboration should be fully recognised, supported and resourced in tertiary education at a time when students' satisfaction and performance are high on the agenda.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1624–1631
    JournalNurse Education Today
    Volume33
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Students
    student
    writer
    Education
    education
    Qualitative Research
    Research
    Uncertainty
    research method
    qualitative research
    nurse
    Nurses
    Research Personnel
    uncertainty
    Interviews
    educator
    monitoring
    Delivery of Health Care
    Pressure
    university

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    Keywords

    • academic writing
    • barriers to writing
    • motivation to write
    • peer support
    • peer-collaboration
    • social capital
    • writing enablers
    • writing in genres

    Cite this

    Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students. / Gopee, Neil; Deane, Mary.

    In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2013, p. 1624–1631.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e701b1a8e7e643cc8cb241c7c9bb471b,
    title = "Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students",
    abstract = "Background: Students develop better academic writing skills as they progress through their higher education programme, but despite recent continuing monitoring of student satisfaction with their education in UK, there has been relatively little research into students' perceptions of the active support that they need and receive to succeed as academic writers. Aim of the study: To examine the strategies that university students on health or social care courses utilise to develop as writers in the face of many pressures and demands from different sources. Research method used: Qualitative research conducted at a British University into undergraduates' writing practices in the field of healthcare. Ten participants took part in semi-structured interviews, half of whom were international students. The data was analysed by the researchers from the field of writing development using thematic analysis. Results: The main findings are that certain students struggle as academic writers if they do not receive tuition on appropriate and effective academic writing through institutional provisions, or through non-institutional strategies, that can promote success with the writing process. There is also uncertainty over the extent to which nurse educators are expected to teach academic writing skills, alongside their discipline-specific subject areas. Conclusions: Both institutional provisions for academic writing development, such as a dedicated writing support department, and non-institutional factors such as peer-collaboration should be fully recognised, supported and resourced in tertiary education at a time when students' satisfaction and performance are high on the agenda.",
    keywords = "academic writing, barriers to writing, motivation to write, peer support, peer-collaboration, social capital, writing enablers, writing in genres",
    author = "Neil Gopee and Mary Deane",
    note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository.",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "1624–1631",
    journal = "Nurse Education Today",
    issn = "0260-6917",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "12",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students

    AU - Gopee, Neil

    AU - Deane, Mary

    N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Background: Students develop better academic writing skills as they progress through their higher education programme, but despite recent continuing monitoring of student satisfaction with their education in UK, there has been relatively little research into students' perceptions of the active support that they need and receive to succeed as academic writers. Aim of the study: To examine the strategies that university students on health or social care courses utilise to develop as writers in the face of many pressures and demands from different sources. Research method used: Qualitative research conducted at a British University into undergraduates' writing practices in the field of healthcare. Ten participants took part in semi-structured interviews, half of whom were international students. The data was analysed by the researchers from the field of writing development using thematic analysis. Results: The main findings are that certain students struggle as academic writers if they do not receive tuition on appropriate and effective academic writing through institutional provisions, or through non-institutional strategies, that can promote success with the writing process. There is also uncertainty over the extent to which nurse educators are expected to teach academic writing skills, alongside their discipline-specific subject areas. Conclusions: Both institutional provisions for academic writing development, such as a dedicated writing support department, and non-institutional factors such as peer-collaboration should be fully recognised, supported and resourced in tertiary education at a time when students' satisfaction and performance are high on the agenda.

    AB - Background: Students develop better academic writing skills as they progress through their higher education programme, but despite recent continuing monitoring of student satisfaction with their education in UK, there has been relatively little research into students' perceptions of the active support that they need and receive to succeed as academic writers. Aim of the study: To examine the strategies that university students on health or social care courses utilise to develop as writers in the face of many pressures and demands from different sources. Research method used: Qualitative research conducted at a British University into undergraduates' writing practices in the field of healthcare. Ten participants took part in semi-structured interviews, half of whom were international students. The data was analysed by the researchers from the field of writing development using thematic analysis. Results: The main findings are that certain students struggle as academic writers if they do not receive tuition on appropriate and effective academic writing through institutional provisions, or through non-institutional strategies, that can promote success with the writing process. There is also uncertainty over the extent to which nurse educators are expected to teach academic writing skills, alongside their discipline-specific subject areas. Conclusions: Both institutional provisions for academic writing development, such as a dedicated writing support department, and non-institutional factors such as peer-collaboration should be fully recognised, supported and resourced in tertiary education at a time when students' satisfaction and performance are high on the agenda.

    KW - academic writing

    KW - barriers to writing

    KW - motivation to write

    KW - peer support

    KW - peer-collaboration

    KW - social capital

    KW - writing enablers

    KW - writing in genres

    U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 1624

    EP - 1631

    JO - Nurse Education Today

    JF - Nurse Education Today

    SN - 0260-6917

    IS - 12

    ER -