Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Stakeholder perceptions of ornamental invasive plants in Southern Africa - improving understanding for management

  • Stellenbosch University
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Successful management of invasive plants often requires broad societal buy-in. Hence, to facilitate management, it is important to understand what influences and drives perceptions of those involved or affected by invasive plants’ distribution, management, and impacts. In this paper, we focus on a sector central to this space—the ornamental industry—and on a geographic region that is highly affected by plant invasions but remains under-researched-Southern
Africa.
Using various techniques (semi-structured interviews, workshops, informal conversations, and questionnaires), we assessed key stakeholders’ understanding of plant invasions and perceptions of invasive ornamental plants, collating data from 78 environmental specialists, 38 ornamental industry staff, and 72 ornamental gardeners. This data collection included participants from Botswana (104), Namibia (50), Zimbabwe (18), South Africa (13), and Zambia (3).
We found that, across these groups, there is a broadly similar understanding of invasions consistent with definitions used in research and policymaking. People are often aware of ecological processes but do not necessarily use “scientific” terms to describe them. However, both the different groups and individuals within the groups differed in how they perceived specific plants. We argue that these differences are shaped by people’s interests, professions, and
socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds, that are, in turn, shaped by broader socio-ecological and geopolitical dynamics. Such differences in perceptions can,
of course, result in conflicts of interest, particularly when varying perceptions are informing conflicting actions.
We believe that stakeholder relations would benefit from open, relational, balanced, and regular communication with a view to reaching agreements. Such communication should value and recognise the diversity in capacities, perceptions and knowledge as a step to removing power imbalances. This is particularly relevant in the Southern Africa context where successful invasive species management requires acknowledging and addressing racial and classist segregation that shape mutual perceptions and relations with invasive plants and landscapes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number116
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalBiological Invasions
Volume28
Issue number5
Early online date29 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Apr 2026

Funding

We are grateful to the people who made this research possible, the participants. We want to thank Lindsay Charter—who co-designed the questionnaire—and Shirley Bethune for their valuable support, cooperation, and input, and Ana Novoa for comments on an early version of the questionnaire. We thank James Bennet and Georges McAllister for their critical reviews of very early versions of related manuscripts and Emma Burnett for her marvellous proofreading of those early versions. Finally, we want to show our sincere gratitude to the editor and associate editor (and reviewer) for their time in providing an insightful, detailed, and encouraging critique that greatly improved this manuscript. We humbly hope to contribute to a more transdisciplinary, transformative, and socially sound invasion research, policy-making, and management. The Coventry University Trailblazers Early Career Researcher and Doctoral Studentship Partnering Scheme (subproject codes 13771-14 and 12160-02) funded this work. Stellenbosch University and Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources also supported this work. Furthermore, the Francistown city council landscaping unit (Botswana), the Botanical Society of Namibia, the Namibian University of Science and Technology and nursery businesses in Botswana and Zimbabwe provided logistic support to the first author (DRC). JW thanks the South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) for funding noting that this publication does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of DFFE or its employees. Centre for Agroecology,Water and Resilience,Coventry University,Trailblazers Early Career Researcher, Jana Fried, Doctoral Studentship Partnering Scheme from Coventry University (sub-project codes 13771-14,Jana Fried,12160-02), Jana Fried,Trailblazers Early Career Researcher, Diana Rodríguez-Cala,Doctoral Studentship Partnering Scheme from Coventry University (sub-project codes 13771-14, Diana Rodríguez-Cala,12160-02), John Wilson, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment

FundersFunder number
Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Stellenbosch University
Coventry University12160-02, 13771-14

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Stakeholder perspectives
    • Plant invasions
    • Invasive species management
    • Southern Africa
    • Environmental management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder perceptions of ornamental invasive plants in Southern Africa - improving understanding for management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this