The ‘uploading’ of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarisation, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. We argue that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the ‘sustaining peace’ agenda, that risks jeopardising the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.
Hunt, C. T., & Curran, D. (2020). Stabilization at the expense of Peacebuilding in UN peacekeeping operations: More than just a phase? Global Governance, (In-press), (In-press). https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02601001