Stabilization at the expense of Peacebuilding in UN peacekeeping operations: More than just a phase?

Charles T. Hunt, David Curran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ‘uploading’ of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarisation, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. We argue that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the ‘sustaining peace’ agenda, that risks jeopardising the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
JournalGlobal Governance
Volume(In-press)
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

peacekeeping
stabilization
UNO
International Conflict Management
militarization
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Mali
global governance
conflict resolution
peace
politics

Cite this

Stabilization at the expense of Peacebuilding in UN peacekeeping operations: More than just a phase? / Hunt, Charles T.; Curran, David.

In: Global Governance, Vol. (In-press), 01.2020, p. (In-press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6fac96e016a40f08a87dd6790d2c219,
title = "Stabilization at the expense of Peacebuilding in UN peacekeeping operations: More than just a phase?",
abstract = "The ‘uploading’ of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarisation, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. We argue that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the ‘sustaining peace’ agenda, that risks jeopardising the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.",
author = "Hunt, {Charles T.} and David Curran",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "(In-press)",
pages = "(In--press)",
journal = "Global Governance",
publisher = "Brill",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stabilization at the expense of Peacebuilding in UN peacekeeping operations: More than just a phase?

AU - Hunt, Charles T.

AU - Curran, David

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - The ‘uploading’ of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarisation, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. We argue that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the ‘sustaining peace’ agenda, that risks jeopardising the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.

AB - The ‘uploading’ of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarisation, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. We argue that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the ‘sustaining peace’ agenda, that risks jeopardising the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.

M3 - Article

VL - (In-press)

SP - (In-press)

JO - Global Governance

JF - Global Governance

ER -