Southern African summer-rainfall variability, and its teleconnections, on interannual to interdecadal timescales in CMIP5 models

Bastien Dieppois, Benjamin Pohl, Julien Cretat, Jonathan M. Eden, Moussa Sidibe, Mark New, Mathieu Rouault, Damian Lawler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study provides the first assessment of CMIP5 model performances in simulating southern Africa (SA) rainfall variability in austral summer (Nov–Feb), and its teleconnections with large-scale climate variability at different timescales. Observed SA rainfall varies at three major timescales: interannual (2–8 years), quasi-decadal (8–13 years; QDV) and interdecadal (15–28 years; IDV). These rainfall fluctuations are, respectively, associated with El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), interacting with climate anomalies in the South Atlantic and South Indian Ocean. CMIP5 models produce their own variability, but perform better in simulating interannual rainfall variability, while QDV and IDV are largely underestimated. These limitations can be partly explained by spatial shifts in core regions of SA rainfall variability in the models. Most models reproduce the impact of La Niña on rainfall at the interannual scale in SA, in spite of limitations in the representation of ENSO. Realistic links between negative IPO are found in some models at the QDV scale, but very poor performances are found at the IDV scale. Strong limitations, i.e. loss or reversal of these teleconnections, are also noted in some simulations. Such model errors, however, do not systematically impact the skill of simulated rainfall variability. This is because biased SST variability in the South Atlantic and South Indian Oceans strongly impact model skills by modulating the impact of Pacific modes of variability. Using probabilistic multi-scale clustering, model uncertainties in SST variability are primarily driven by differences from one model to another, or comparable models (sharing similar physics), at the global scale. At the regional scale, i.e. SA rainfall variability and associated teleconnections, while differences in model physics remain a large source of uncertainty, the contribution of internal climate variability is increasing. This is particularly true at the QDV and IDV scales, where the individual simulations from the same model tend to differentiate, and the sampling error increase.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3505-3527
Number of pages23
JournalClimate Dynamics
Volume53
Issue number5-6
Early online date14 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

teleconnection
timescale
rainfall
summer
Southern Oscillation
CMIP
climate
physics
sea surface temperature
oscillation
Pacific Decadal Oscillation
simulation
Southern Africa
anomaly

Keywords

  • CMIP5 models
  • Interannual to interdecadal timescales
  • Sea-surface temperature anomalies
  • Southern African rainfall variability
  • Teleconnections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Southern African summer-rainfall variability, and its teleconnections, on interannual to interdecadal timescales in CMIP5 models. / Dieppois, Bastien; Pohl, Benjamin; Cretat, Julien; Eden, Jonathan M.; Sidibe, Moussa; New, Mark; Rouault, Mathieu; Lawler, Damian.

In: Climate Dynamics, Vol. 53, No. 5-6, 13.09.2019, p. 3505-3527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dieppois, Bastien ; Pohl, Benjamin ; Cretat, Julien ; Eden, Jonathan M. ; Sidibe, Moussa ; New, Mark ; Rouault, Mathieu ; Lawler, Damian. / Southern African summer-rainfall variability, and its teleconnections, on interannual to interdecadal timescales in CMIP5 models. In: Climate Dynamics. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 5-6. pp. 3505-3527.
@article{e3bd2591bc4e4db1a2b0a2b35b8933e4,
title = "Southern African summer-rainfall variability, and its teleconnections, on interannual to interdecadal timescales in CMIP5 models",
abstract = "This study provides the first assessment of CMIP5 model performances in simulating southern Africa (SA) rainfall variability in austral summer (Nov–Feb), and its teleconnections with large-scale climate variability at different timescales. Observed SA rainfall varies at three major timescales: interannual (2–8 years), quasi-decadal (8–13 years; QDV) and interdecadal (15–28 years; IDV). These rainfall fluctuations are, respectively, associated with El Ni{\~n}o Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), interacting with climate anomalies in the South Atlantic and South Indian Ocean. CMIP5 models produce their own variability, but perform better in simulating interannual rainfall variability, while QDV and IDV are largely underestimated. These limitations can be partly explained by spatial shifts in core regions of SA rainfall variability in the models. Most models reproduce the impact of La Ni{\~n}a on rainfall at the interannual scale in SA, in spite of limitations in the representation of ENSO. Realistic links between negative IPO are found in some models at the QDV scale, but very poor performances are found at the IDV scale. Strong limitations, i.e. loss or reversal of these teleconnections, are also noted in some simulations. Such model errors, however, do not systematically impact the skill of simulated rainfall variability. This is because biased SST variability in the South Atlantic and South Indian Oceans strongly impact model skills by modulating the impact of Pacific modes of variability. Using probabilistic multi-scale clustering, model uncertainties in SST variability are primarily driven by differences from one model to another, or comparable models (sharing similar physics), at the global scale. At the regional scale, i.e. SA rainfall variability and associated teleconnections, while differences in model physics remain a large source of uncertainty, the contribution of internal climate variability is increasing. This is particularly true at the QDV and IDV scales, where the individual simulations from the same model tend to differentiate, and the sampling error increase.",
keywords = "CMIP5 models, Interannual to interdecadal timescales, Sea-surface temperature anomalies, Southern African rainfall variability, Teleconnections",
author = "Bastien Dieppois and Benjamin Pohl and Julien Cretat and Eden, {Jonathan M.} and Moussa Sidibe and Mark New and Mathieu Rouault and Damian Lawler",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s00382-019-04720-5",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "3505--3527",
journal = "Climate Dynamics",
issn = "0930-7575",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Southern African summer-rainfall variability, and its teleconnections, on interannual to interdecadal timescales in CMIP5 models

AU - Dieppois, Bastien

AU - Pohl, Benjamin

AU - Cretat, Julien

AU - Eden, Jonathan M.

AU - Sidibe, Moussa

AU - New, Mark

AU - Rouault, Mathieu

AU - Lawler, Damian

PY - 2019/9/13

Y1 - 2019/9/13

N2 - This study provides the first assessment of CMIP5 model performances in simulating southern Africa (SA) rainfall variability in austral summer (Nov–Feb), and its teleconnections with large-scale climate variability at different timescales. Observed SA rainfall varies at three major timescales: interannual (2–8 years), quasi-decadal (8–13 years; QDV) and interdecadal (15–28 years; IDV). These rainfall fluctuations are, respectively, associated with El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), interacting with climate anomalies in the South Atlantic and South Indian Ocean. CMIP5 models produce their own variability, but perform better in simulating interannual rainfall variability, while QDV and IDV are largely underestimated. These limitations can be partly explained by spatial shifts in core regions of SA rainfall variability in the models. Most models reproduce the impact of La Niña on rainfall at the interannual scale in SA, in spite of limitations in the representation of ENSO. Realistic links between negative IPO are found in some models at the QDV scale, but very poor performances are found at the IDV scale. Strong limitations, i.e. loss or reversal of these teleconnections, are also noted in some simulations. Such model errors, however, do not systematically impact the skill of simulated rainfall variability. This is because biased SST variability in the South Atlantic and South Indian Oceans strongly impact model skills by modulating the impact of Pacific modes of variability. Using probabilistic multi-scale clustering, model uncertainties in SST variability are primarily driven by differences from one model to another, or comparable models (sharing similar physics), at the global scale. At the regional scale, i.e. SA rainfall variability and associated teleconnections, while differences in model physics remain a large source of uncertainty, the contribution of internal climate variability is increasing. This is particularly true at the QDV and IDV scales, where the individual simulations from the same model tend to differentiate, and the sampling error increase.

AB - This study provides the first assessment of CMIP5 model performances in simulating southern Africa (SA) rainfall variability in austral summer (Nov–Feb), and its teleconnections with large-scale climate variability at different timescales. Observed SA rainfall varies at three major timescales: interannual (2–8 years), quasi-decadal (8–13 years; QDV) and interdecadal (15–28 years; IDV). These rainfall fluctuations are, respectively, associated with El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), interacting with climate anomalies in the South Atlantic and South Indian Ocean. CMIP5 models produce their own variability, but perform better in simulating interannual rainfall variability, while QDV and IDV are largely underestimated. These limitations can be partly explained by spatial shifts in core regions of SA rainfall variability in the models. Most models reproduce the impact of La Niña on rainfall at the interannual scale in SA, in spite of limitations in the representation of ENSO. Realistic links between negative IPO are found in some models at the QDV scale, but very poor performances are found at the IDV scale. Strong limitations, i.e. loss or reversal of these teleconnections, are also noted in some simulations. Such model errors, however, do not systematically impact the skill of simulated rainfall variability. This is because biased SST variability in the South Atlantic and South Indian Oceans strongly impact model skills by modulating the impact of Pacific modes of variability. Using probabilistic multi-scale clustering, model uncertainties in SST variability are primarily driven by differences from one model to another, or comparable models (sharing similar physics), at the global scale. At the regional scale, i.e. SA rainfall variability and associated teleconnections, while differences in model physics remain a large source of uncertainty, the contribution of internal climate variability is increasing. This is particularly true at the QDV and IDV scales, where the individual simulations from the same model tend to differentiate, and the sampling error increase.

KW - CMIP5 models

KW - Interannual to interdecadal timescales

KW - Sea-surface temperature anomalies

KW - Southern African rainfall variability

KW - Teleconnections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062980162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00382-019-04720-5

DO - 10.1007/s00382-019-04720-5

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 3505

EP - 3527

JO - Climate Dynamics

JF - Climate Dynamics

SN - 0930-7575

IS - 5-6

ER -