“Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence.

Simon Goodman, Kate Walker

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

    64 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study is the first to address the ways in which male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) talk about memory in their reports of their IPV and how these are used to manage their accountability for the violence. Drawing on and developing the discursive psychological literature on talk about memory, which highlights how such talk is used to perform practical actions within interactions, a discourse analysis is conducted on interviews with six male perpetrators of recent, multiple incidents of IPV who were undergoing treatment. The analysis identified the varying ways in which memory was used: first, claims of forgetting were used to avoid answering difficult and potentially incriminating questions; second, claims of clear memories were used to position partners as problematic and responsible for violence; and third, claims about simultaneously remembering and forgetting were found. The implications of these strategies for managing identity and accountability are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)375-392
    JournalDiscourse Studies
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    Early online date24 Jun 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

    Fingerprint

    violence
    Data storage equipment
    Social Responsibility
    Violence
    responsibility
    discourse analysis
    Interviews
    Psychology
    incident
    Intimate Partner Violence
    interaction
    interview
    Forgetting
    Accountability
    Perpetrators
    Remembering
    Discursive
    Interaction
    Psychological Literature
    Discourse Analysis

    Keywords

    • Accountability
    • discourse analysis
    • discursive psychology
    • IPV
    • memory
    • relationships
    • violence

    Cite this

    “Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence. / Goodman, Simon; Walker, Kate.

    In: Discourse Studies, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 375-392.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

    Goodman, S & Walker, K 2016, '“Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence.' Discourse Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616647884
    Goodman S, Walker K. “Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence. Discourse Studies. 2016 Aug 1;18(4):375-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616647884
    Goodman, Simon ; Walker, Kate. / “Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence. In: Discourse Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 375-392.
    @article{960b54f786a14e65b97476a0fb2ac861,
    title = "“Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence.",
    abstract = "This study is the first to address the ways in which male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) talk about memory in their reports of their IPV and how these are used to manage their accountability for the violence. Drawing on and developing the discursive psychological literature on talk about memory, which highlights how such talk is used to perform practical actions within interactions, a discourse analysis is conducted on interviews with six male perpetrators of recent, multiple incidents of IPV who were undergoing treatment. The analysis identified the varying ways in which memory was used: first, claims of forgetting were used to avoid answering difficult and potentially incriminating questions; second, claims of clear memories were used to position partners as problematic and responsible for violence; and third, claims about simultaneously remembering and forgetting were found. The implications of these strategies for managing identity and accountability are discussed.",
    keywords = "Accountability, discourse analysis, discursive psychology, IPV, memory, relationships, violence",
    author = "Simon Goodman and Kate Walker",
    year = "2016",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1461445616647884",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "375--392",
    journal = "Discourse Studies",
    issn = "1461-4456",
    publisher = "Sage",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - “Some I don’t remember and some I do”: Memory talk in accounts of intimate partner violence.

    AU - Goodman, Simon

    AU - Walker, Kate

    PY - 2016/8/1

    Y1 - 2016/8/1

    N2 - This study is the first to address the ways in which male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) talk about memory in their reports of their IPV and how these are used to manage their accountability for the violence. Drawing on and developing the discursive psychological literature on talk about memory, which highlights how such talk is used to perform practical actions within interactions, a discourse analysis is conducted on interviews with six male perpetrators of recent, multiple incidents of IPV who were undergoing treatment. The analysis identified the varying ways in which memory was used: first, claims of forgetting were used to avoid answering difficult and potentially incriminating questions; second, claims of clear memories were used to position partners as problematic and responsible for violence; and third, claims about simultaneously remembering and forgetting were found. The implications of these strategies for managing identity and accountability are discussed.

    AB - This study is the first to address the ways in which male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) talk about memory in their reports of their IPV and how these are used to manage their accountability for the violence. Drawing on and developing the discursive psychological literature on talk about memory, which highlights how such talk is used to perform practical actions within interactions, a discourse analysis is conducted on interviews with six male perpetrators of recent, multiple incidents of IPV who were undergoing treatment. The analysis identified the varying ways in which memory was used: first, claims of forgetting were used to avoid answering difficult and potentially incriminating questions; second, claims of clear memories were used to position partners as problematic and responsible for violence; and third, claims about simultaneously remembering and forgetting were found. The implications of these strategies for managing identity and accountability are discussed.

    KW - Accountability

    KW - discourse analysis

    KW - discursive psychology

    KW - IPV

    KW - memory

    KW - relationships

    KW - violence

    U2 - 10.1177/1461445616647884

    DO - 10.1177/1461445616647884

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 375

    EP - 392

    JO - Discourse Studies

    JF - Discourse Studies

    SN - 1461-4456

    IS - 4

    ER -

    Access to Document