Abstract
Soft-law approach is followed in the UK for improving gender diversity on boards. Regulatory authorities recommend voluntary targets and companies endeavour to achieve them. In this paper the authors present the result of a study exploring the causes and the solutions of gender homogeneity on British boards. The paper is based on thirty three interviews with board members of FTSE 350 companies. The paper posits that British boards are gender-homogeneous due to – discrimination against women, lack of confidence in women and lack of objectivity in nomination process. Thus regulatory intervention is warranted to improve gender diversity on boards and current soft-law approach is the best-suited strategy due to established institutional processes. However there is an increasing demand for more intrusive statutory action if the current approach fails to achieve the objective of gender parity on boards, soon enough. The paper contributes to Institutional theory, public policy and corporate praxis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 22 Jun 2017 |
Event | 17th EURAM Conference - Glasgow, United Kingdom Duration: 21 Jun 2017 → 24 Jun 2017 http://2017.euramfullpaper.org/program/papers.asp |
Conference
Conference | 17th EURAM Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | EURAM 2017 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Glasgow |
Period | 21/06/17 → 24/06/17 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Soft-law approach
- Board DIrector's perspective
- Opening the black box
- Board Diversity