Socioeconomic deprivation and the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in England and Wales

M. C. Steiner, D. Lowe, K. Beckford, J. Blakely, C. E. Bolton, S. Elkin, W. D.-C. Man, C. M. Roberts, Louise Sewell, P. Walker, S. J. Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)


Background Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity and health status in patients with COPD, but many patients assessed for PR do not complete therapy. It is unknown whether socioeconomic deprivation associates with rates of completion of PR or the magnitude of clinical benefits bequeathed by PR. Methods PR services across England and Wales enrolled patients to the National PR audit in 2015. Deprivation was assessed using Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) derived from postcodes. Study outcomes were completion of therapy and change in measures of exercise performance and health status. Univariate and multivariate analyses investigated associations between IMD and these outcomes. Results 210 PR programmes enrolled 7413 patients. Compared with the general population, the PR sample lived in relatively deprived neighbourhoods. There was a statistically significant association between rates of completion of PR and quintile of deprivation (70% in the least and 50% in the most deprived quintiles). After baseline adjustments, the risk ratio (95% CI) for patients in the most deprived relative to the least deprived quintile was 0.79 (0.73 to 0.85), p
Original languageEnglish
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2017

Bibliographical note

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:


Dive into the research topics of 'Socioeconomic deprivation and the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this