Size effect, methodological issues and 'risk-to-default': Evidence from the UK stock market

Panagiotis Andrikopoulos, Arief Daynes, David Latimer, Paraskevas Pagas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper re-examines the small firm premium in the UK from December 1987 to December 2004 using a new survivorship bias-free and look-ahead bias-free database of the UK market covering stocks officially listed in the UK during this period. Prior research (Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1987. The Hoare Govett smaller companies index for the UK. Hoare Govett Limited, January; Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) documented an annual small-size premium in the UK market of around 6% during the period 1955-1986 and an annual small-size discount of 6% during the years 1989-1997. Our results show a continuation of the small firm premium in the UK during 1988-2004 in excess of 7% per year. We conclude that the reversal of the small firm premium documented by Dimson and Marsh (1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) is dependent on the data sample and methodology used. The main contribution to the 7%+geometric annual premium reported here comes mainly during the years 1993 and 1999. Furthermore, exploitation of the small firm premium depends on the strategy used and in particular on the length of the holding period before rolling over the strategy. Thus, while it can be argued that an economically significant small firm anomaly continues to exist, it appears to be sample-dependent, time-varying and unreliable, and difficult to exploit in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-314
Number of pages16
JournalThe European Journal of Finance
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Premium
Stock market
Small firms
Portfolio management
Market anomalies
Exploitation
Methodology
Data base
Reversal
Survivorship bias
Anomaly
Small companies
Discount
Time-varying

Keywords

  • Market efficiency
  • Methodological issues
  • Small-size effect
  • UK equity market

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Size effect, methodological issues and 'risk-to-default' : Evidence from the UK stock market. / Andrikopoulos, Panagiotis; Daynes, Arief; Latimer, David; Pagas, Paraskevas.

In: The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 14, No. 4, 06.2008, p. 299-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Andrikopoulos, Panagiotis ; Daynes, Arief ; Latimer, David ; Pagas, Paraskevas. / Size effect, methodological issues and 'risk-to-default' : Evidence from the UK stock market. In: The European Journal of Finance. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 299-314.
@article{e7774000a8de4f79a153a6f8289864bf,
title = "Size effect, methodological issues and 'risk-to-default': Evidence from the UK stock market",
abstract = "This paper re-examines the small firm premium in the UK from December 1987 to December 2004 using a new survivorship bias-free and look-ahead bias-free database of the UK market covering stocks officially listed in the UK during this period. Prior research (Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1987. The Hoare Govett smaller companies index for the UK. Hoare Govett Limited, January; Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) documented an annual small-size premium in the UK market of around 6{\%} during the period 1955-1986 and an annual small-size discount of 6{\%} during the years 1989-1997. Our results show a continuation of the small firm premium in the UK during 1988-2004 in excess of 7{\%} per year. We conclude that the reversal of the small firm premium documented by Dimson and Marsh (1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) is dependent on the data sample and methodology used. The main contribution to the 7{\%}+geometric annual premium reported here comes mainly during the years 1993 and 1999. Furthermore, exploitation of the small firm premium depends on the strategy used and in particular on the length of the holding period before rolling over the strategy. Thus, while it can be argued that an economically significant small firm anomaly continues to exist, it appears to be sample-dependent, time-varying and unreliable, and difficult to exploit in practice.",
keywords = "Market efficiency, Methodological issues, Small-size effect, UK equity market",
author = "Panagiotis Andrikopoulos and Arief Daynes and David Latimer and Paraskevas Pagas",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/13518470802042070",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "299--314",
journal = "The European Journal of Finance",
issn = "1351-847X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Size effect, methodological issues and 'risk-to-default'

T2 - Evidence from the UK stock market

AU - Andrikopoulos, Panagiotis

AU - Daynes, Arief

AU - Latimer, David

AU - Pagas, Paraskevas

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - This paper re-examines the small firm premium in the UK from December 1987 to December 2004 using a new survivorship bias-free and look-ahead bias-free database of the UK market covering stocks officially listed in the UK during this period. Prior research (Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1987. The Hoare Govett smaller companies index for the UK. Hoare Govett Limited, January; Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) documented an annual small-size premium in the UK market of around 6% during the period 1955-1986 and an annual small-size discount of 6% during the years 1989-1997. Our results show a continuation of the small firm premium in the UK during 1988-2004 in excess of 7% per year. We conclude that the reversal of the small firm premium documented by Dimson and Marsh (1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) is dependent on the data sample and methodology used. The main contribution to the 7%+geometric annual premium reported here comes mainly during the years 1993 and 1999. Furthermore, exploitation of the small firm premium depends on the strategy used and in particular on the length of the holding period before rolling over the strategy. Thus, while it can be argued that an economically significant small firm anomaly continues to exist, it appears to be sample-dependent, time-varying and unreliable, and difficult to exploit in practice.

AB - This paper re-examines the small firm premium in the UK from December 1987 to December 2004 using a new survivorship bias-free and look-ahead bias-free database of the UK market covering stocks officially listed in the UK during this period. Prior research (Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1987. The Hoare Govett smaller companies index for the UK. Hoare Govett Limited, January; Dimson, E., and P.R. Marsh. 1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) documented an annual small-size premium in the UK market of around 6% during the period 1955-1986 and an annual small-size discount of 6% during the years 1989-1997. Our results show a continuation of the small firm premium in the UK during 1988-2004 in excess of 7% per year. We conclude that the reversal of the small firm premium documented by Dimson and Marsh (1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25, no. 2: 53-69) is dependent on the data sample and methodology used. The main contribution to the 7%+geometric annual premium reported here comes mainly during the years 1993 and 1999. Furthermore, exploitation of the small firm premium depends on the strategy used and in particular on the length of the holding period before rolling over the strategy. Thus, while it can be argued that an economically significant small firm anomaly continues to exist, it appears to be sample-dependent, time-varying and unreliable, and difficult to exploit in practice.

KW - Market efficiency

KW - Methodological issues

KW - Small-size effect

KW - UK equity market

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45849084650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13518470802042070

DO - 10.1080/13518470802042070

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 299

EP - 314

JO - The European Journal of Finance

JF - The European Journal of Finance

SN - 1351-847X

IS - 4

ER -