Site-specific probabilistic ecological risk assessment of a volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated tidal estuary

James Hunt, Gavin Birch, Michael St J. Warne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (δ). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50% effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (δ) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (δ = 25%)-closest to the source area-followed by the inner estuary (δ = 4%) and the Floodvale tributary (δ = 2%), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (δ = 0.1%), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50% of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1172-1181
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume29
Issue number5
Early online date21 Jan 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Estuaries
chlorinated hydrocarbon
Risk assessment
risk assessment
Tides
estuary
tide
Hazards
hazard assessment
Screening
dose-response relationship
Toxicity
tributary
Botany
Aquatic Organisms
toxicity
South Australia
New South Wales
Groundwater

Keywords

  • Chlorinated hydrocarbon
  • Probabilistic ecological risk assessment
  • Quantitative risk
  • Tidal estuary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Site-specific probabilistic ecological risk assessment of a volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated tidal estuary. / Hunt, James; Birch, Gavin; Warne, Michael St J.

In: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 29, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 1172-1181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2dc832f4b37946c4b862c216438f5c4c,
title = "Site-specific probabilistic ecological risk assessment of a volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated tidal estuary",
abstract = "Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (δ). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50{\%} effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (δ) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (δ = 25{\%})-closest to the source area-followed by the inner estuary (δ = 4{\%}) and the Floodvale tributary (δ = 2{\%}), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (δ = 0.1{\%}), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50{\%} of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment.",
keywords = "Chlorinated hydrocarbon, Probabilistic ecological risk assessment, Quantitative risk, Tidal estuary",
author = "James Hunt and Gavin Birch and Warne, {Michael St J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/etc.130",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1172--1181",
journal = "Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry",
issn = "0730-7268",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Site-specific probabilistic ecological risk assessment of a volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated tidal estuary

AU - Hunt, James

AU - Birch, Gavin

AU - Warne, Michael St J.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (δ). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50% effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (δ) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (δ = 25%)-closest to the source area-followed by the inner estuary (δ = 4%) and the Floodvale tributary (δ = 2%), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (δ = 0.1%), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50% of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment.

AB - Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (δ). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50% effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (δ) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (δ = 25%)-closest to the source area-followed by the inner estuary (δ = 4%) and the Floodvale tributary (δ = 2%), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (δ = 0.1%), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50% of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment.

KW - Chlorinated hydrocarbon

KW - Probabilistic ecological risk assessment

KW - Quantitative risk

KW - Tidal estuary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953591485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/etc.130

DO - 10.1002/etc.130

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1172

EP - 1181

JO - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

JF - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

SN - 0730-7268

IS - 5

ER -