Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue

Dimitar Angelov, L. Ganobcsik-Williams

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Most critical literature on online writing tutoring is based on the premise that face-to-face tutorials are—and should be—the preferred method for tutoring academic writing. According to this premise, the pedagogic validity of any other mode of tutoring depends on how accurately it replicates the “ideal” conditions of face-to-face interaction. Following this logic, the asynchronous writing tutorial comes last in the hierarchy of preferred tutorial formats. This chapter offers a different perspective on asynchronous online writing tutoring based on the teaching practices in place at the Centre for Academic Writing (CAW), Coventry University, England. It develops a new theoretical framework for existing tutorial practices and suggests juxtaposition through parenthetical comments as a pedagogically-sound strategy for teaching critical thinking in asynchronous online student-tutor communication and potentially in other teaching contexts. Our analysis relies on Bakhtin’s understanding of language as intrinsically dialogic and applies this concept to the academic discourse of asynchronous writing tutorials.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLearning and Teaching Writing Online
EditorsMary Deane, Teresa Guasch
PublisherBrill
Pages46-64
Volume29
ISBN (Print)9789004290846
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

dialogue
Teaching
pedagogics
teaching practice
tutor
discourse
communication
interaction
language
student

Cite this

Angelov, D., & Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (2015). Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue. In M. Deane, & T. Guasch (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Writing Online (Vol. 29, pp. 46-64). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290846_005

Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue. / Angelov, Dimitar; Ganobcsik-Williams, L.

Learning and Teaching Writing Online. ed. / Mary Deane; Teresa Guasch. Vol. 29 Brill, 2015. p. 46-64.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Angelov, D & Ganobcsik-Williams, L 2015, Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue. in M Deane & T Guasch (eds), Learning and Teaching Writing Online. vol. 29, Brill, pp. 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290846_005
Angelov D, Ganobcsik-Williams L. Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue. In Deane M, Guasch T, editors, Learning and Teaching Writing Online. Vol. 29. Brill. 2015. p. 46-64 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290846_005
Angelov, Dimitar ; Ganobcsik-Williams, L. / Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue. Learning and Teaching Writing Online. editor / Mary Deane ; Teresa Guasch. Vol. 29 Brill, 2015. pp. 46-64
@inbook{973a1fcafdb64b4d8c379a349699b4a4,
title = "Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue",
abstract = "Most critical literature on online writing tutoring is based on the premise that face-to-face tutorials are—and should be—the preferred method for tutoring academic writing. According to this premise, the pedagogic validity of any other mode of tutoring depends on how accurately it replicates the “ideal” conditions of face-to-face interaction. Following this logic, the asynchronous writing tutorial comes last in the hierarchy of preferred tutorial formats. This chapter offers a different perspective on asynchronous online writing tutoring based on the teaching practices in place at the Centre for Academic Writing (CAW), Coventry University, England. It develops a new theoretical framework for existing tutorial practices and suggests juxtaposition through parenthetical comments as a pedagogically-sound strategy for teaching critical thinking in asynchronous online student-tutor communication and potentially in other teaching contexts. Our analysis relies on Bakhtin’s understanding of language as intrinsically dialogic and applies this concept to the academic discourse of asynchronous writing tutorials.",
author = "Dimitar Angelov and L. Ganobcsik-Williams",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1163/9789004290846_005",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004290846",
volume = "29",
pages = "46--64",
editor = "Mary Deane and Teresa Guasch",
booktitle = "Learning and Teaching Writing Online",
publisher = "Brill",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Singular Asynchronous Writing Tutorials: A Pedagogy of Text-Bound Dialogue

AU - Angelov, Dimitar

AU - Ganobcsik-Williams, L.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Most critical literature on online writing tutoring is based on the premise that face-to-face tutorials are—and should be—the preferred method for tutoring academic writing. According to this premise, the pedagogic validity of any other mode of tutoring depends on how accurately it replicates the “ideal” conditions of face-to-face interaction. Following this logic, the asynchronous writing tutorial comes last in the hierarchy of preferred tutorial formats. This chapter offers a different perspective on asynchronous online writing tutoring based on the teaching practices in place at the Centre for Academic Writing (CAW), Coventry University, England. It develops a new theoretical framework for existing tutorial practices and suggests juxtaposition through parenthetical comments as a pedagogically-sound strategy for teaching critical thinking in asynchronous online student-tutor communication and potentially in other teaching contexts. Our analysis relies on Bakhtin’s understanding of language as intrinsically dialogic and applies this concept to the academic discourse of asynchronous writing tutorials.

AB - Most critical literature on online writing tutoring is based on the premise that face-to-face tutorials are—and should be—the preferred method for tutoring academic writing. According to this premise, the pedagogic validity of any other mode of tutoring depends on how accurately it replicates the “ideal” conditions of face-to-face interaction. Following this logic, the asynchronous writing tutorial comes last in the hierarchy of preferred tutorial formats. This chapter offers a different perspective on asynchronous online writing tutoring based on the teaching practices in place at the Centre for Academic Writing (CAW), Coventry University, England. It develops a new theoretical framework for existing tutorial practices and suggests juxtaposition through parenthetical comments as a pedagogically-sound strategy for teaching critical thinking in asynchronous online student-tutor communication and potentially in other teaching contexts. Our analysis relies on Bakhtin’s understanding of language as intrinsically dialogic and applies this concept to the academic discourse of asynchronous writing tutorials.

U2 - 10.1163/9789004290846_005

DO - 10.1163/9789004290846_005

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789004290846

VL - 29

SP - 46

EP - 64

BT - Learning and Teaching Writing Online

A2 - Deane, Mary

A2 - Guasch, Teresa

PB - Brill

ER -