Abstract
There were many aeronautical decision-making (ADM) mnemonic-based methods exist. However, there is no empirical research that suggests that they are actually effective in improving decision-making. In this study a short, ADM training course was constructed around two mnemonic methods, SHOR and DESIDE. Forty-one pilots from Republic of China Tactical Training Wing participated: half received a short ADM training course and half did not. Their decision-making skill was evaluated during a series of emergency situations presented in a full-flight simulator on the dimensions of situation assessment, risk management and response time. Significant improvements were noted in the quality of pilots' situation assessment and risk management, however this was usually at the expense of speed of response. The results do strongly suggest, though, that ADM is trainable and is demonstrably effective in improving decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, HFES 2006 |
| Pages | 2615-2619 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006 - San Francisco, United States Duration: 16 Oct 2006 → 20 Oct 2006 |
Conference
| Conference | 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | San Francisco |
| Period | 16/10/06 → 20/10/06 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering