Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes

J.V.L. Hunt, D.R. Lombardi, S. Atkinson, A.R.G. Barber, M. Barnes, C.T. Boyko, J. Brown, J. Bryson, D. Butler, Silvio Caputo, M. Caserio, R. Coles, R.F.D. Cooper, R. Farmani, Mark Gaterell, J. Hale, C. Hales, C.N. Hewitt, L. Jankovic, I. Jefferson & 7 others J. Leach, A.R. MacKenzie, F.A. Memon, J.P. Sadler, C. Weingaertner, J.D. Whyatt, C.D.F. Rogers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    54 Citations (Scopus)
    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)740-772
    JournalSustainability
    Volume4
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    scenario
    Sustainable development
    environmental economics
    Economics
    stakeholder
    sustainability
    Industry
    market
    narrative
    world
    Group
    driver
    economics
    policy
    effect

    Bibliographical note

    This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License unported 3.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ for full license terms.

    Keywords

    • sustainability
    • future scenarios
    • scenario archetypes

    Cite this

    Hunt, J. V. L., Lombardi, D. R., Atkinson, S., Barber, A. R. G., Barnes, M., Boyko, C. T., ... Rogers, C. D. F. (2012). Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes. Sustainability, 4(4), 740-772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4040740

    Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes. / Hunt, J.V.L.; Lombardi, D.R.; Atkinson, S.; Barber, A.R.G.; Barnes, M.; Boyko, C.T.; Brown, J.; Bryson, J.; Butler, D.; Caputo, Silvio; Caserio, M.; Coles, R.; Cooper, R.F.D.; Farmani, R.; Gaterell, Mark; Hale, J.; Hales, C.; Hewitt, C.N.; Jankovic, L.; Jefferson, I.; Leach, J.; MacKenzie, A.R.; Memon, F.A.; Sadler, J.P.; Weingaertner, C.; Whyatt, J.D.; Rogers, C.D.F.

    In: Sustainability, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2012, p. 740-772.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Hunt, JVL, Lombardi, DR, Atkinson, S, Barber, ARG, Barnes, M, Boyko, CT, Brown, J, Bryson, J, Butler, D, Caputo, S, Caserio, M, Coles, R, Cooper, RFD, Farmani, R, Gaterell, M, Hale, J, Hales, C, Hewitt, CN, Jankovic, L, Jefferson, I, Leach, J, MacKenzie, AR, Memon, FA, Sadler, JP, Weingaertner, C, Whyatt, JD & Rogers, CDF 2012, 'Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes' Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 740-772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4040740
    Hunt JVL, Lombardi DR, Atkinson S, Barber ARG, Barnes M, Boyko CT et al. Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes. Sustainability. 2012;4(4):740-772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4040740
    Hunt, J.V.L. ; Lombardi, D.R. ; Atkinson, S. ; Barber, A.R.G. ; Barnes, M. ; Boyko, C.T. ; Brown, J. ; Bryson, J. ; Butler, D. ; Caputo, Silvio ; Caserio, M. ; Coles, R. ; Cooper, R.F.D. ; Farmani, R. ; Gaterell, Mark ; Hale, J. ; Hales, C. ; Hewitt, C.N. ; Jankovic, L. ; Jefferson, I. ; Leach, J. ; MacKenzie, A.R. ; Memon, F.A. ; Sadler, J.P. ; Weingaertner, C. ; Whyatt, J.D. ; Rogers, C.D.F. / Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes. In: Sustainability. 2012 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 740-772.
    @article{c24e725400c64ed0bef6e502e72eb282,
    title = "Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes",
    abstract = "Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.",
    keywords = "sustainability, future scenarios, scenario archetypes",
    author = "J.V.L. Hunt and D.R. Lombardi and S. Atkinson and A.R.G. Barber and M. Barnes and C.T. Boyko and J. Brown and J. Bryson and D. Butler and Silvio Caputo and M. Caserio and R. Coles and R.F.D. Cooper and R. Farmani and Mark Gaterell and J. Hale and C. Hales and C.N. Hewitt and L. Jankovic and I. Jefferson and J. Leach and A.R. MacKenzie and F.A. Memon and J.P. Sadler and C. Weingaertner and J.D. Whyatt and C.D.F. Rogers",
    note = "This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License unported 3.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ for full license terms.",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.3390/su4040740",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "740--772",
    journal = "Sustainability",
    issn = "2071-1050",
    publisher = "MDPI",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes

    AU - Hunt, J.V.L.

    AU - Lombardi, D.R.

    AU - Atkinson, S.

    AU - Barber, A.R.G.

    AU - Barnes, M.

    AU - Boyko, C.T.

    AU - Brown, J.

    AU - Bryson, J.

    AU - Butler, D.

    AU - Caputo, Silvio

    AU - Caserio, M.

    AU - Coles, R.

    AU - Cooper, R.F.D.

    AU - Farmani, R.

    AU - Gaterell, Mark

    AU - Hale, J.

    AU - Hales, C.

    AU - Hewitt, C.N.

    AU - Jankovic, L.

    AU - Jefferson, I.

    AU - Leach, J.

    AU - MacKenzie, A.R.

    AU - Memon, F.A.

    AU - Sadler, J.P.

    AU - Weingaertner, C.

    AU - Whyatt, J.D.

    AU - Rogers, C.D.F.

    N1 - This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License unported 3.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ for full license terms.

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.

    AB - Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.

    KW - sustainability

    KW - future scenarios

    KW - scenario archetypes

    U2 - 10.3390/su4040740

    DO - 10.3390/su4040740

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 740

    EP - 772

    JO - Sustainability

    JF - Sustainability

    SN - 2071-1050

    IS - 4

    ER -