Scale impacts on spatial variability in reference evapotranspiration

Tim Hess, Andre Daccache, Alireza Daneshkhah, Jerry Knox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the hydrological cycle, and a key variable in hydrological modelling and water resources management. However, understanding the impacts of spatial variability in ET and the appropriate scale at which ET data should be incorporated into hydrological models, particularly at the regional scale, is often overlooked. This is in contrast to dealing with the spatial variability in rainfall data where existing guidance is widely available. This paper assesses the impacts of scale on the estimation of reference ET (ETo) by comparing data from individual weather stations against values derived from three national datasets, at varying resolutions. These include the UK Climate Impacts Programme 50 km climatology (UKCP50), the UK Met Office 5 km climatology (UKMO5) and the regional values published in the Agricultural Climate of England and Wales (ACEW). The national datasets were compared against the individual weather station data and the UKMO5 was shown to provide the best estimate of ETo at a given site. The potential impacts on catchment modelling were then considered by mapping variance in ETo to show how geographical location and catchment size can have a major impact, with small lowland catchments having much higher variance than those with much larger areas or in the uplands. Some important implications for catchment hydrological modelling are highlighted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)601-609
Number of pages9
JournalHydrological Sciences Journal
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

evapotranspiration
catchment
climatology
hydrological modeling
weather station
climate effect
hydrological cycle
rainfall
climate
modeling

Keywords

  • water resources
  • catchment

Cite this

Scale impacts on spatial variability in reference evapotranspiration. / Hess, Tim; Daccache, Andre; Daneshkhah, Alireza; Knox, Jerry.

In: Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3, 09.03.2016, p. 601-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hess, Tim ; Daccache, Andre ; Daneshkhah, Alireza ; Knox, Jerry. / Scale impacts on spatial variability in reference evapotranspiration. In: Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 601-609.
@article{57a9c08af0cf4c57a351e9d9aaa80197,
title = "Scale impacts on spatial variability in reference evapotranspiration",
abstract = "Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the hydrological cycle, and a key variable in hydrological modelling and water resources management. However, understanding the impacts of spatial variability in ET and the appropriate scale at which ET data should be incorporated into hydrological models, particularly at the regional scale, is often overlooked. This is in contrast to dealing with the spatial variability in rainfall data where existing guidance is widely available. This paper assesses the impacts of scale on the estimation of reference ET (ETo) by comparing data from individual weather stations against values derived from three national datasets, at varying resolutions. These include the UK Climate Impacts Programme 50 km climatology (UKCP50), the UK Met Office 5 km climatology (UKMO5) and the regional values published in the Agricultural Climate of England and Wales (ACEW). The national datasets were compared against the individual weather station data and the UKMO5 was shown to provide the best estimate of ETo at a given site. The potential impacts on catchment modelling were then considered by mapping variance in ETo to show how geographical location and catchment size can have a major impact, with small lowland catchments having much higher variance than those with much larger areas or in the uplands. Some important implications for catchment hydrological modelling are highlighted.",
keywords = "water resources, catchment",
author = "Tim Hess and Andre Daccache and Alireza Daneshkhah and Jerry Knox",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/02626667.2015.1083105",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "601--609",
journal = "Hydrological Sciences Journal",
issn = "0262-6667",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scale impacts on spatial variability in reference evapotranspiration

AU - Hess, Tim

AU - Daccache, Andre

AU - Daneshkhah, Alireza

AU - Knox, Jerry

PY - 2016/3/9

Y1 - 2016/3/9

N2 - Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the hydrological cycle, and a key variable in hydrological modelling and water resources management. However, understanding the impacts of spatial variability in ET and the appropriate scale at which ET data should be incorporated into hydrological models, particularly at the regional scale, is often overlooked. This is in contrast to dealing with the spatial variability in rainfall data where existing guidance is widely available. This paper assesses the impacts of scale on the estimation of reference ET (ETo) by comparing data from individual weather stations against values derived from three national datasets, at varying resolutions. These include the UK Climate Impacts Programme 50 km climatology (UKCP50), the UK Met Office 5 km climatology (UKMO5) and the regional values published in the Agricultural Climate of England and Wales (ACEW). The national datasets were compared against the individual weather station data and the UKMO5 was shown to provide the best estimate of ETo at a given site. The potential impacts on catchment modelling were then considered by mapping variance in ETo to show how geographical location and catchment size can have a major impact, with small lowland catchments having much higher variance than those with much larger areas or in the uplands. Some important implications for catchment hydrological modelling are highlighted.

AB - Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in the hydrological cycle, and a key variable in hydrological modelling and water resources management. However, understanding the impacts of spatial variability in ET and the appropriate scale at which ET data should be incorporated into hydrological models, particularly at the regional scale, is often overlooked. This is in contrast to dealing with the spatial variability in rainfall data where existing guidance is widely available. This paper assesses the impacts of scale on the estimation of reference ET (ETo) by comparing data from individual weather stations against values derived from three national datasets, at varying resolutions. These include the UK Climate Impacts Programme 50 km climatology (UKCP50), the UK Met Office 5 km climatology (UKMO5) and the regional values published in the Agricultural Climate of England and Wales (ACEW). The national datasets were compared against the individual weather station data and the UKMO5 was shown to provide the best estimate of ETo at a given site. The potential impacts on catchment modelling were then considered by mapping variance in ETo to show how geographical location and catchment size can have a major impact, with small lowland catchments having much higher variance than those with much larger areas or in the uplands. Some important implications for catchment hydrological modelling are highlighted.

KW - water resources

KW - catchment

U2 - 10.1080/02626667.2015.1083105

DO - 10.1080/02626667.2015.1083105

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 601

EP - 609

JO - Hydrological Sciences Journal

JF - Hydrological Sciences Journal

SN - 0262-6667

IS - 3

ER -