Safeguarding or Surveillance? Social Work, Prevent and Fundamentalist Violence

Stephen Cowden, Jonathon Picken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper seeks to critically explore the construction of the Prevent
counter-terrorism initiative within Social Work in the UK, and to consider
the implications this has for Social Work. We begin by discussing the
conceptualisation of ‘radicalisation’ in the work of Arun Kundnani, one of
the leading critics of Prevent, pointing to the limitations of this as a means
of grasping the nature of Salafi-jihadi groupings. We then move to a
discussion of the development of counter-terrorism policy in the UK,
looking at the way the 2015 legislative guidance has re-situated
radicalisation from a ‘security’ issue to a ‘safeguarding’ issue. We see this
as significant for the way it has facilitated Social Work being directly drawn
into the orbit of Prevent, with radicalisation being re-constructed as part
of Social Work’s concern with the vulnerability of children and young
people involved in wider forms of exploitation, including Child Sexual
Exploitation. We consider the reception of this shift within Social Work as
well as look at evidence into how this is working in practice. We then
consider challenges to this ‘safeguarding’ paradigm, which argue that this
has involved Social Work being drawn into the ideological monitoring of
Muslim communities: a ‘surveillance’ paradigm. We conclude by arguing
for a critical defence of a safeguarding approach based on the harms which
fundamentalist violence clearly represents to children and young people
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-131
Number of pages41
JournalFeminist Dissent
VolumeNo. 4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

surveillance
social work
violence
radicalization
terrorism
paradigm
grouping
exploitation
critic
vulnerability
monitoring
community
evidence

Bibliographical note

Stephen Cowden is a Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Coventry University
and his research is concerned with Social Work theory and practice, Critical
Pedagogy, and the Sociology of Religious Fundamentalism. Stephen is a
joint commissioning editor for the series New Disciplinary Perspectives in
Education for the publisher Peter Lang and with David Ridley he is editor
of The Practice of Equality: Jacques Rancière and Critical Pedagogy
(forthcoming 2019). He is also with Gurnam Singh, Sarah Amsler, and Joyce
Canaan, co-author of Acts of Knowing: Critical Pedagogy In, Against and
Beyond the University (2013). He is a member of the Editorial Collective of
Feminist Dissent.

Keywords

  • Safeguarding, Surveillance, Social Work, Counter-terrorism, Salafi-Jihadism

Cite this

Safeguarding or Surveillance? Social Work, Prevent and Fundamentalist Violence. / Cowden, Stephen; Picken, Jonathon.

In: Feminist Dissent, Vol. No. 4, 11.03.2019, p. 91-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ba047f6b3994f22835ccd2d0de0b70d,
title = "Safeguarding or Surveillance?: Social Work, Prevent and Fundamentalist Violence",
abstract = "This paper seeks to critically explore the construction of the Preventcounter-terrorism initiative within Social Work in the UK, and to considerthe implications this has for Social Work. We begin by discussing theconceptualisation of ‘radicalisation’ in the work of Arun Kundnani, one ofthe leading critics of Prevent, pointing to the limitations of this as a meansof grasping the nature of Salafi-jihadi groupings. We then move to adiscussion of the development of counter-terrorism policy in the UK,looking at the way the 2015 legislative guidance has re-situatedradicalisation from a ‘security’ issue to a ‘safeguarding’ issue. We see thisas significant for the way it has facilitated Social Work being directly drawninto the orbit of Prevent, with radicalisation being re-constructed as partof Social Work’s concern with the vulnerability of children and youngpeople involved in wider forms of exploitation, including Child SexualExploitation. We consider the reception of this shift within Social Work aswell as look at evidence into how this is working in practice. We thenconsider challenges to this ‘safeguarding’ paradigm, which argue that thishas involved Social Work being drawn into the ideological monitoring ofMuslim communities: a ‘surveillance’ paradigm. We conclude by arguingfor a critical defence of a safeguarding approach based on the harms whichfundamentalist violence clearly represents to children and young people",
keywords = "Safeguarding, Surveillance, Social Work, Counter-terrorism, Salafi-Jihadism",
author = "Stephen Cowden and Jonathon Picken",
note = "Stephen Cowden is a Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Coventry University and his research is concerned with Social Work theory and practice, Critical Pedagogy, and the Sociology of Religious Fundamentalism. Stephen is a joint commissioning editor for the series New Disciplinary Perspectives in Education for the publisher Peter Lang and with David Ridley he is editor of The Practice of Equality: Jacques Ranci{\`e}re and Critical Pedagogy (forthcoming 2019). He is also with Gurnam Singh, Sarah Amsler, and Joyce Canaan, co-author of Acts of Knowing: Critical Pedagogy In, Against and Beyond the University (2013). He is a member of the Editorial Collective of Feminist Dissent.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.31273/fd.n4.2019.320",
language = "English",
volume = "No. 4",
pages = "91--131",
journal = "Feminist Dissent",
publisher = "University of Warwick",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safeguarding or Surveillance?

T2 - Social Work, Prevent and Fundamentalist Violence

AU - Cowden, Stephen

AU - Picken, Jonathon

N1 - Stephen Cowden is a Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Coventry University and his research is concerned with Social Work theory and practice, Critical Pedagogy, and the Sociology of Religious Fundamentalism. Stephen is a joint commissioning editor for the series New Disciplinary Perspectives in Education for the publisher Peter Lang and with David Ridley he is editor of The Practice of Equality: Jacques Rancière and Critical Pedagogy (forthcoming 2019). He is also with Gurnam Singh, Sarah Amsler, and Joyce Canaan, co-author of Acts of Knowing: Critical Pedagogy In, Against and Beyond the University (2013). He is a member of the Editorial Collective of Feminist Dissent.

PY - 2019/3/11

Y1 - 2019/3/11

N2 - This paper seeks to critically explore the construction of the Preventcounter-terrorism initiative within Social Work in the UK, and to considerthe implications this has for Social Work. We begin by discussing theconceptualisation of ‘radicalisation’ in the work of Arun Kundnani, one ofthe leading critics of Prevent, pointing to the limitations of this as a meansof grasping the nature of Salafi-jihadi groupings. We then move to adiscussion of the development of counter-terrorism policy in the UK,looking at the way the 2015 legislative guidance has re-situatedradicalisation from a ‘security’ issue to a ‘safeguarding’ issue. We see thisas significant for the way it has facilitated Social Work being directly drawninto the orbit of Prevent, with radicalisation being re-constructed as partof Social Work’s concern with the vulnerability of children and youngpeople involved in wider forms of exploitation, including Child SexualExploitation. We consider the reception of this shift within Social Work aswell as look at evidence into how this is working in practice. We thenconsider challenges to this ‘safeguarding’ paradigm, which argue that thishas involved Social Work being drawn into the ideological monitoring ofMuslim communities: a ‘surveillance’ paradigm. We conclude by arguingfor a critical defence of a safeguarding approach based on the harms whichfundamentalist violence clearly represents to children and young people

AB - This paper seeks to critically explore the construction of the Preventcounter-terrorism initiative within Social Work in the UK, and to considerthe implications this has for Social Work. We begin by discussing theconceptualisation of ‘radicalisation’ in the work of Arun Kundnani, one ofthe leading critics of Prevent, pointing to the limitations of this as a meansof grasping the nature of Salafi-jihadi groupings. We then move to adiscussion of the development of counter-terrorism policy in the UK,looking at the way the 2015 legislative guidance has re-situatedradicalisation from a ‘security’ issue to a ‘safeguarding’ issue. We see thisas significant for the way it has facilitated Social Work being directly drawninto the orbit of Prevent, with radicalisation being re-constructed as partof Social Work’s concern with the vulnerability of children and youngpeople involved in wider forms of exploitation, including Child SexualExploitation. We consider the reception of this shift within Social Work aswell as look at evidence into how this is working in practice. We thenconsider challenges to this ‘safeguarding’ paradigm, which argue that thishas involved Social Work being drawn into the ideological monitoring ofMuslim communities: a ‘surveillance’ paradigm. We conclude by arguingfor a critical defence of a safeguarding approach based on the harms whichfundamentalist violence clearly represents to children and young people

KW - Safeguarding, Surveillance, Social Work, Counter-terrorism, Salafi-Jihadism

U2 - 10.31273/fd.n4.2019.320

DO - 10.31273/fd.n4.2019.320

M3 - Article

VL - No. 4

SP - 91

EP - 131

JO - Feminist Dissent

JF - Feminist Dissent

ER -