Abstract
This article uniquely demonstrates how UK debates about supporting child refugees during the “refugee crisis” came to be used as support for leaving the European Union (EU). The research question “how did users of a news website respond to a report about the UK government's decision to allow child refugees into the UK?” is addressed with a rigorous discursive analysis of an internet discussion forum on the anti-immigrant website MailOnline consisting of 2,014 unique posts, with a reach of 30 million viewers. Analysis demonstrated that (1) child refugees were presented as adults, (2) allowing in refugees was presented as a “burden” on taxpayers, (3) the decision was presented as opposed to the public's will, and (4) this was used as a warrant for leaving the EU. The significant implication of this analysis is that political attempts at associating the refugee crisis with the EU may have been successful in this context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1161-1172 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 15 Feb 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Brexit
- discourse analysis
- European Union
- migrant crisis
- migrants
- refugee crisis
- refugees
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Sad day for the UK”: The linking of debates about settling refugee children in the UK with Brexit on an anti-immigrant news website'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS