“Sad day for the UK”: The linking of debates about settling refugee children in the UK with Brexit on an anti-immigrant news website

Simon Goodman, Amrita Narang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    8 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article uniquely demonstrates how UK debates about supporting child refugees during the “refugee crisis” came to be used as support for leaving the European Union (EU). The research question “how did users of a news website respond to a report about the UK government's decision to allow child refugees into the UK?” is addressed with a rigorous discursive analysis of an internet discussion forum on the anti-immigrant website MailOnline consisting of 2,014 unique posts, with a reach of 30 million viewers. Analysis demonstrated that (1) child refugees were presented as adults, (2) allowing in refugees was presented as a “burden” on taxpayers, (3) the decision was presented as opposed to the public's will, and (4) this was used as a warrant for leaving the EU. The significant implication of this analysis is that political attempts at associating the refugee crisis with the EU may have been successful in this context.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1161-1172
    Number of pages12
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume49
    Issue number6
    Early online date15 Feb 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

      Fingerprint

    Keywords

    • Brexit
    • discourse analysis
    • European Union
    • migrant crisis
    • migrants
    • refugee crisis
    • refugees

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology

    Cite this