Rule Fragmentation in the Airworthiness Regulations: A Human Factors Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As a result of increasing organizational interdependence and integration of systems in commercial airline operation, it is argued that the manner in which human factors issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Error and workload are two of the more pervasive aspects of human factors in the airworthiness regulations and are both products of complex interactions among equipment design, procedures, training, and the environment. However, these aspects of human factors cannot be regulated on a localized basis, and a more systemic, holistic approach to the regulation of error and workload is required. It is suggested that a safety case–based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for human factors issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-86
Number of pages12
JournalAviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

fragmentation
regulation
workload
organizational behavior
holistic approach
air traffic
interdependence
interaction

Keywords

  • Accidents
  • Airworthiness regulations
  • Error
  • Safetycase
  • Workload

Cite this

Rule Fragmentation in the Airworthiness Regulations: A Human Factors Perspective. / Harris, Don.

In: Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, Vol. 1, No. 2, 06.12.2011, p. 75-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8387cd3dc1e041ddad2f2a12b2a86641,
title = "Rule Fragmentation in the Airworthiness Regulations: A Human Factors Perspective",
abstract = "As a result of increasing organizational interdependence and integration of systems in commercial airline operation, it is argued that the manner in which human factors issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Error and workload are two of the more pervasive aspects of human factors in the airworthiness regulations and are both products of complex interactions among equipment design, procedures, training, and the environment. However, these aspects of human factors cannot be regulated on a localized basis, and a more systemic, holistic approach to the regulation of error and workload is required. It is suggested that a safety case–based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for human factors issues.",
keywords = "Accidents, Airworthiness regulations, Error, Safetycase, Workload",
author = "Don Harris",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1027/2192-0923/a000012",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "75--86",
journal = "Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors",
issn = "2192-0923",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing Corp",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rule Fragmentation in the Airworthiness Regulations: A Human Factors Perspective

AU - Harris, Don

PY - 2011/12/6

Y1 - 2011/12/6

N2 - As a result of increasing organizational interdependence and integration of systems in commercial airline operation, it is argued that the manner in which human factors issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Error and workload are two of the more pervasive aspects of human factors in the airworthiness regulations and are both products of complex interactions among equipment design, procedures, training, and the environment. However, these aspects of human factors cannot be regulated on a localized basis, and a more systemic, holistic approach to the regulation of error and workload is required. It is suggested that a safety case–based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for human factors issues.

AB - As a result of increasing organizational interdependence and integration of systems in commercial airline operation, it is argued that the manner in which human factors issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Error and workload are two of the more pervasive aspects of human factors in the airworthiness regulations and are both products of complex interactions among equipment design, procedures, training, and the environment. However, these aspects of human factors cannot be regulated on a localized basis, and a more systemic, holistic approach to the regulation of error and workload is required. It is suggested that a safety case–based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for human factors issues.

KW - Accidents

KW - Airworthiness regulations

KW - Error

KW - Safetycase

KW - Workload

U2 - 10.1027/2192-0923/a000012

DO - 10.1027/2192-0923/a000012

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 75

EP - 86

JO - Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors

JF - Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors

SN - 2192-0923

IS - 2

ER -