Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations: A human factors perspective

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

Human error has been identified as the primary risk to flight safety. Two of the more pervasive aspects of Human Factors encountered throughout the airworthiness regulations are error and workload. However, as a result of increasing organizational inter-dependence and integration of aircraft systems it is argued that the manner in which these issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Workload and error are both products of complex interactions between equipment design, procedures, training and the environment. These issues cannot be regulated on a localized basis. A more systemic, holistic approach to Human Factors regulation is required. It is suggested that a Safety Case-based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for Human Factors issues.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics
EditorsDon Harris
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages546-555
Number of pages10
Volume6781 LNAI
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-642-21741-8
ISBN (Print)978-3-642-21740-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event9th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics - Orlando, United States
Duration: 9 Jul 201114 Jul 2011
Conference number: 9

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Volume6781 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics
Abbreviated titleEPCE
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period9/07/1114/07/11

Fingerprint

Human Factors
Human engineering
Fragmentation
Workload
Safety
Human Error
Aviation
Aircraft
Interaction

Keywords

  • Accidents
  • Error
  • Regulations
  • Safety Case
  • Socio-technical systems
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

Harris, D. (2011). Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations: A human factors perspective. In D. Harris (Ed.), International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Vol. 6781 LNAI, pp. 546-555). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6781 LNCS). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58

Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations : A human factors perspective. / Harris, Don.

International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. ed. / Don Harris. Vol. 6781 LNAI Springer Verlag, 2011. p. 546-555 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6781 LNCS).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Harris, D 2011, Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations: A human factors perspective. in D Harris (ed.), International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. vol. 6781 LNAI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6781 LNCS, Springer Verlag, pp. 546-555, 9th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Orlando, United States, 9/07/11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58
Harris D. Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations: A human factors perspective. In Harris D, editor, International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Vol. 6781 LNAI. Springer Verlag. 2011. p. 546-555. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58
Harris, Don. / Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations : A human factors perspective. International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. editor / Don Harris. Vol. 6781 LNAI Springer Verlag, 2011. pp. 546-555 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
@inproceedings{3d20cd5965d8417992d7402e7a8f4228,
title = "Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations: A human factors perspective",
abstract = "Human error has been identified as the primary risk to flight safety. Two of the more pervasive aspects of Human Factors encountered throughout the airworthiness regulations are error and workload. However, as a result of increasing organizational inter-dependence and integration of aircraft systems it is argued that the manner in which these issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Workload and error are both products of complex interactions between equipment design, procedures, training and the environment. These issues cannot be regulated on a localized basis. A more systemic, holistic approach to Human Factors regulation is required. It is suggested that a Safety Case-based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for Human Factors issues.",
keywords = "Accidents, Error, Regulations, Safety Case, Socio-technical systems, Workload",
author = "Don Harris",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-642-21740-1",
volume = "6781 LNAI",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "546--555",
editor = "Don Harris",
booktitle = "International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics",
address = "Austria",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Rule fragmentation in the airworthiness regulations

T2 - A human factors perspective

AU - Harris, Don

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Human error has been identified as the primary risk to flight safety. Two of the more pervasive aspects of Human Factors encountered throughout the airworthiness regulations are error and workload. However, as a result of increasing organizational inter-dependence and integration of aircraft systems it is argued that the manner in which these issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Workload and error are both products of complex interactions between equipment design, procedures, training and the environment. These issues cannot be regulated on a localized basis. A more systemic, holistic approach to Human Factors regulation is required. It is suggested that a Safety Case-based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for Human Factors issues.

AB - Human error has been identified as the primary risk to flight safety. Two of the more pervasive aspects of Human Factors encountered throughout the airworthiness regulations are error and workload. However, as a result of increasing organizational inter-dependence and integration of aircraft systems it is argued that the manner in which these issues are addressed in the aviation regulations is becoming increasingly incompatible with human and organizational behavior in an airline. Workload and error are both products of complex interactions between equipment design, procedures, training and the environment. These issues cannot be regulated on a localized basis. A more systemic, holistic approach to Human Factors regulation is required. It is suggested that a Safety Case-based approach may be better used as an adjunct to existing regulations for Human Factors issues.

KW - Accidents

KW - Error

KW - Regulations

KW - Safety Case

KW - Socio-technical systems

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960099959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_58

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-3-642-21740-1

VL - 6781 LNAI

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SP - 546

EP - 555

BT - International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics

A2 - Harris, Don

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -