Robust student knowledge: Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions

Claudia Mazziotti, Wayne Holmes, Michael Wiedmann, Katharina Loibp, Nikol Rummel, Manolis Mavrikis, Alice Hansen, Beate Grawemeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robust knowledge consists of both conceptual and procedural knowledge. In order to address both types of knowledge, offering students opportunities to explore target concepts in an exploratory learning environment (ELE) is insufficient. Instead, we need to combine exploratory learning environments, to support students acquisition of conceptual knowledge, with more structured learning environments that allow students to practice problem-solving procedures step-by-step, to support students' acquisition of procedural knowledge. However, how best to combine both kinds of learning environments and thus both types of learning activities is an open question. We have developed a pedagogical intervention model that selects and sequences learning activities, exploratory learning activities and structured practice activities, that are appropriate for the individual learner. Technically, our intervention model is implemented as a rule-based system in a learning platform about fractions. The model's decisionmaking process relies on the detection of each individual student's level of challenge (i.e. whether they were under-, appropriately or over-challenged by the previous learning activity). Thus, our model adapts flexibly to each individual student's needs and provides them with a unique sequence of learning activities. Our formative evaluation trials suggest that single components of the intervention model, such as the ELE, mostly achieve their aims. The interplay between the different components of the intervention model (i.e. the outcomes of sequencing and selecting exploratory and structured practice activities) is currently being evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-40
Number of pages9
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume1432
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2015 - Madrid, Spain
Duration: 22 Jun 201526 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Students
Knowledge based systems

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer aided instruction
  • Education computing
  • Knowledge based systems
  • Problem solving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Robust student knowledge : Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions. / Mazziotti, Claudia; Holmes, Wayne; Wiedmann, Michael; Loibp, Katharina; Rummel, Nikol; Mavrikis, Manolis; Hansen, Alice; Grawemeyer, Beate.

In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1432, 01.01.2015, p. 32-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazziotti, Claudia ; Holmes, Wayne ; Wiedmann, Michael ; Loibp, Katharina ; Rummel, Nikol ; Mavrikis, Manolis ; Hansen, Alice ; Grawemeyer, Beate. / Robust student knowledge : Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2015 ; Vol. 1432. pp. 32-40.
@article{c4b3d8d9a71a4f548c44973fbc857508,
title = "Robust student knowledge: Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions",
abstract = "Robust knowledge consists of both conceptual and procedural knowledge. In order to address both types of knowledge, offering students opportunities to explore target concepts in an exploratory learning environment (ELE) is insufficient. Instead, we need to combine exploratory learning environments, to support students acquisition of conceptual knowledge, with more structured learning environments that allow students to practice problem-solving procedures step-by-step, to support students' acquisition of procedural knowledge. However, how best to combine both kinds of learning environments and thus both types of learning activities is an open question. We have developed a pedagogical intervention model that selects and sequences learning activities, exploratory learning activities and structured practice activities, that are appropriate for the individual learner. Technically, our intervention model is implemented as a rule-based system in a learning platform about fractions. The model's decisionmaking process relies on the detection of each individual student's level of challenge (i.e. whether they were under-, appropriately or over-challenged by the previous learning activity). Thus, our model adapts flexibly to each individual student's needs and provides them with a unique sequence of learning activities. Our formative evaluation trials suggest that single components of the intervention model, such as the ELE, mostly achieve their aims. The interplay between the different components of the intervention model (i.e. the outcomes of sequencing and selecting exploratory and structured practice activities) is currently being evaluated.",
keywords = "Artificial intelligence, Computer aided instruction, Education computing, Knowledge based systems, Problem solving",
author = "Claudia Mazziotti and Wayne Holmes and Michael Wiedmann and Katharina Loibp and Nikol Rummel and Manolis Mavrikis and Alice Hansen and Beate Grawemeyer",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "1432",
pages = "32--40",
journal = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",
issn = "1613-0073",
publisher = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust student knowledge

T2 - Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions

AU - Mazziotti, Claudia

AU - Holmes, Wayne

AU - Wiedmann, Michael

AU - Loibp, Katharina

AU - Rummel, Nikol

AU - Mavrikis, Manolis

AU - Hansen, Alice

AU - Grawemeyer, Beate

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Robust knowledge consists of both conceptual and procedural knowledge. In order to address both types of knowledge, offering students opportunities to explore target concepts in an exploratory learning environment (ELE) is insufficient. Instead, we need to combine exploratory learning environments, to support students acquisition of conceptual knowledge, with more structured learning environments that allow students to practice problem-solving procedures step-by-step, to support students' acquisition of procedural knowledge. However, how best to combine both kinds of learning environments and thus both types of learning activities is an open question. We have developed a pedagogical intervention model that selects and sequences learning activities, exploratory learning activities and structured practice activities, that are appropriate for the individual learner. Technically, our intervention model is implemented as a rule-based system in a learning platform about fractions. The model's decisionmaking process relies on the detection of each individual student's level of challenge (i.e. whether they were under-, appropriately or over-challenged by the previous learning activity). Thus, our model adapts flexibly to each individual student's needs and provides them with a unique sequence of learning activities. Our formative evaluation trials suggest that single components of the intervention model, such as the ELE, mostly achieve their aims. The interplay between the different components of the intervention model (i.e. the outcomes of sequencing and selecting exploratory and structured practice activities) is currently being evaluated.

AB - Robust knowledge consists of both conceptual and procedural knowledge. In order to address both types of knowledge, offering students opportunities to explore target concepts in an exploratory learning environment (ELE) is insufficient. Instead, we need to combine exploratory learning environments, to support students acquisition of conceptual knowledge, with more structured learning environments that allow students to practice problem-solving procedures step-by-step, to support students' acquisition of procedural knowledge. However, how best to combine both kinds of learning environments and thus both types of learning activities is an open question. We have developed a pedagogical intervention model that selects and sequences learning activities, exploratory learning activities and structured practice activities, that are appropriate for the individual learner. Technically, our intervention model is implemented as a rule-based system in a learning platform about fractions. The model's decisionmaking process relies on the detection of each individual student's level of challenge (i.e. whether they were under-, appropriately or over-challenged by the previous learning activity). Thus, our model adapts flexibly to each individual student's needs and provides them with a unique sequence of learning activities. Our formative evaluation trials suggest that single components of the intervention model, such as the ELE, mostly achieve their aims. The interplay between the different components of the intervention model (i.e. the outcomes of sequencing and selecting exploratory and structured practice activities) is currently being evaluated.

KW - Artificial intelligence

KW - Computer aided instruction

KW - Education computing

KW - Knowledge based systems

KW - Problem solving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944342738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1432

SP - 32

EP - 40

JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

SN - 1613-0073

ER -