Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters

Yumi Huang, Stacey Wood, Dale Berger, Yaniv Hanoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Earlier frameworks have indicated that older adults tend to experience decline in their deliberative decisional capacity, while their affective abilities tend to remain intact (Peters, Hess, Västfjäll, & Auman, 2007). The present study applied this framework to the study of risky decision-making across the lifespan. Two versions of the Columbia Card Task (CCT) were used to trigger either affective decision-making (i.e., the “warm” CCT) or deliberative decision-making (i.e., the “cold” CCT) in a sample of 158 individuals across the lifespan. Overall there were no age differences in risk seeking. However, there was a significant interaction between age and condition, such that older adults were relatively more risk seeking in the cold condition only. In terms of everyday decision-making, context matters and risk propensity may shift within older adults depending upon the context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-187
Number of pages9
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright © The Authors [2013] This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • decision-making
  • dual system
  • age difference
  • risk taking
  • risky choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this