Rhetoric and etiological beliefs about sexuality: Reader responses to Cynthia Nixon’s New York Times interview

Adam Jowett, Sophie Barker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 2012, the US actress Cynthia Nixon was quoted in New York Times Magazine as having stated that “for me, it [being gay] is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me”. The interview attracted international media attention and public criticism by lesbian and gay activists. This paper suggests a rhetorical approach to understanding etiological beliefs and provides a discursive analysis of 198 online comments by readers of Pink News, a gay news website which reported on Nixon’s controversial interview. This paper explores common arguments used in readers’ comments about Nixon and examines the rhetorical construction of sexuality. The analysis examines three themes within the data. Firstly, biological essentialism was treated by many readers as common knowledge; secondly readers suggested that only bisexuals have ‘choice’; and thirdly it was suggested by both Nixon’s critics and her supporters that counter arguments colluded with homophobia. The paper suggests that there is an ideological dilemma whereby both ‘born-this-way’ and ‘choice’ arguments can be understood as colluding with anti-gay prejudice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-783
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Homosexuality
Volume65
Issue number6
Early online date4 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Sexuality
sexuality
rhetoric
news
Interviews
common knowledge
interview
prejudice
magazine
website
critic
criticism
Homophobia
Sexual Minorities
homophobia

Keywords

  • sexual orientation
  • essentialism
  • etiological beliefs
  • discursive

Cite this

Rhetoric and etiological beliefs about sexuality: Reader responses to Cynthia Nixon’s New York Times interview. / Jowett, Adam; Barker, Sophie.

In: Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2018, p. 766-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2632911c55e94c82929a3318b3ee33a3,
title = "Rhetoric and etiological beliefs about sexuality: Reader responses to Cynthia Nixon’s New York Times interview",
abstract = "In 2012, the US actress Cynthia Nixon was quoted in New York Times Magazine as having stated that “for me, it [being gay] is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me”. The interview attracted international media attention and public criticism by lesbian and gay activists. This paper suggests a rhetorical approach to understanding etiological beliefs and provides a discursive analysis of 198 online comments by readers of Pink News, a gay news website which reported on Nixon’s controversial interview. This paper explores common arguments used in readers’ comments about Nixon and examines the rhetorical construction of sexuality. The analysis examines three themes within the data. Firstly, biological essentialism was treated by many readers as common knowledge; secondly readers suggested that only bisexuals have ‘choice’; and thirdly it was suggested by both Nixon’s critics and her supporters that counter arguments colluded with homophobia. The paper suggests that there is an ideological dilemma whereby both ‘born-this-way’ and ‘choice’ arguments can be understood as colluding with anti-gay prejudice.",
keywords = "sexual orientation, essentialism, etiological beliefs, discursive",
author = "Adam Jowett and Sophie Barker",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/00918369.2017.1364544",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "766--783",
journal = "Journal of Homosexuality",
issn = "0091-8369",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rhetoric and etiological beliefs about sexuality: Reader responses to Cynthia Nixon’s New York Times interview

AU - Jowett, Adam

AU - Barker, Sophie

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In 2012, the US actress Cynthia Nixon was quoted in New York Times Magazine as having stated that “for me, it [being gay] is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me”. The interview attracted international media attention and public criticism by lesbian and gay activists. This paper suggests a rhetorical approach to understanding etiological beliefs and provides a discursive analysis of 198 online comments by readers of Pink News, a gay news website which reported on Nixon’s controversial interview. This paper explores common arguments used in readers’ comments about Nixon and examines the rhetorical construction of sexuality. The analysis examines three themes within the data. Firstly, biological essentialism was treated by many readers as common knowledge; secondly readers suggested that only bisexuals have ‘choice’; and thirdly it was suggested by both Nixon’s critics and her supporters that counter arguments colluded with homophobia. The paper suggests that there is an ideological dilemma whereby both ‘born-this-way’ and ‘choice’ arguments can be understood as colluding with anti-gay prejudice.

AB - In 2012, the US actress Cynthia Nixon was quoted in New York Times Magazine as having stated that “for me, it [being gay] is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me”. The interview attracted international media attention and public criticism by lesbian and gay activists. This paper suggests a rhetorical approach to understanding etiological beliefs and provides a discursive analysis of 198 online comments by readers of Pink News, a gay news website which reported on Nixon’s controversial interview. This paper explores common arguments used in readers’ comments about Nixon and examines the rhetorical construction of sexuality. The analysis examines three themes within the data. Firstly, biological essentialism was treated by many readers as common knowledge; secondly readers suggested that only bisexuals have ‘choice’; and thirdly it was suggested by both Nixon’s critics and her supporters that counter arguments colluded with homophobia. The paper suggests that there is an ideological dilemma whereby both ‘born-this-way’ and ‘choice’ arguments can be understood as colluding with anti-gay prejudice.

KW - sexual orientation

KW - essentialism

KW - etiological beliefs

KW - discursive

U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1364544

DO - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1364544

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 766

EP - 783

JO - Journal of Homosexuality

JF - Journal of Homosexuality

SN - 0091-8369

IS - 6

ER -