Revisiting knowledge warehousing: theoretical foundations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ever since the late 1990s, different research communities have used the term 'knowledge warehousing' to refer to several types of IT-based tools. An extensive review of the literature on this topic revealed that existing approaches to knowledge warehousing may be classified into three completely different categories. None of the studies reviewed has been able to provide a compelling justification for their suitability. Given such lack of clarity, it seems that we are just experiencing a 'syntactic upgrade' of the concept of data warehousing into a new, more fashionable term. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the human nature of knowledge would even allow such a resource to be warehoused. On the basis of advantages and limitations of existing notions of knowledge warehousing, this paper aims to provide tools required to unify existing disparate views of knowledge warehousing by focusing on aims of approaches rather than terminology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)572-586
JournalInternational Jounal of Business Information Systems,
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Data warehouses
Syntactics
Terminology
Warehousing
Upgrade
Justification
Human nature
Resources
Data warehousing

Bibliographical note

Please note Dr Garcia-Perez was working at Cranfield University at the time of publication. The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

Keywords

  • knowledge warehousing
  • knowledge sharing
  • data warehousing
  • document management
  • information management
  • decision support systems
  • DSS
  • knowledge management

Cite this

Revisiting knowledge warehousing: theoretical foundations. / Garcia-Perez, Alexeis; Mitra, A.

In: International Jounal of Business Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2008, p. 572-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39e34d82dfc8451d9c50d01d0550c2df,
title = "Revisiting knowledge warehousing: theoretical foundations",
abstract = "Ever since the late 1990s, different research communities have used the term 'knowledge warehousing' to refer to several types of IT-based tools. An extensive review of the literature on this topic revealed that existing approaches to knowledge warehousing may be classified into three completely different categories. None of the studies reviewed has been able to provide a compelling justification for their suitability. Given such lack of clarity, it seems that we are just experiencing a 'syntactic upgrade' of the concept of data warehousing into a new, more fashionable term. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the human nature of knowledge would even allow such a resource to be warehoused. On the basis of advantages and limitations of existing notions of knowledge warehousing, this paper aims to provide tools required to unify existing disparate views of knowledge warehousing by focusing on aims of approaches rather than terminology.",
keywords = "knowledge warehousing, knowledge sharing, data warehousing, document management, information management, decision support systems, DSS, knowledge management",
author = "Alexeis Garcia-Perez and A. Mitra",
note = "Please note Dr Garcia-Perez was working at Cranfield University at the time of publication. The full text of this item is not available from the repository.",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1504/IJBIS.2008.018991",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "572--586",
journal = "International Journal of Business Information Systems",
issn = "1746-0972",
publisher = "Inderscience",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting knowledge warehousing: theoretical foundations

AU - Garcia-Perez, Alexeis

AU - Mitra, A.

N1 - Please note Dr Garcia-Perez was working at Cranfield University at the time of publication. The full text of this item is not available from the repository.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Ever since the late 1990s, different research communities have used the term 'knowledge warehousing' to refer to several types of IT-based tools. An extensive review of the literature on this topic revealed that existing approaches to knowledge warehousing may be classified into three completely different categories. None of the studies reviewed has been able to provide a compelling justification for their suitability. Given such lack of clarity, it seems that we are just experiencing a 'syntactic upgrade' of the concept of data warehousing into a new, more fashionable term. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the human nature of knowledge would even allow such a resource to be warehoused. On the basis of advantages and limitations of existing notions of knowledge warehousing, this paper aims to provide tools required to unify existing disparate views of knowledge warehousing by focusing on aims of approaches rather than terminology.

AB - Ever since the late 1990s, different research communities have used the term 'knowledge warehousing' to refer to several types of IT-based tools. An extensive review of the literature on this topic revealed that existing approaches to knowledge warehousing may be classified into three completely different categories. None of the studies reviewed has been able to provide a compelling justification for their suitability. Given such lack of clarity, it seems that we are just experiencing a 'syntactic upgrade' of the concept of data warehousing into a new, more fashionable term. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the human nature of knowledge would even allow such a resource to be warehoused. On the basis of advantages and limitations of existing notions of knowledge warehousing, this paper aims to provide tools required to unify existing disparate views of knowledge warehousing by focusing on aims of approaches rather than terminology.

KW - knowledge warehousing

KW - knowledge sharing

KW - data warehousing

KW - document management

KW - information management

KW - decision support systems

KW - DSS

KW - knowledge management

U2 - 10.1504/IJBIS.2008.018991

DO - 10.1504/IJBIS.2008.018991

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 572

EP - 586

JO - International Journal of Business Information Systems

JF - International Journal of Business Information Systems

SN - 1746-0972

IS - 6

ER -