Review of Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate

Thomas Joseph Coleman III

doi:10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2

Review of Can Science Explain Religion? The Cognitive Science Debate

Thomas Joseph Coleman III

Research output: Contribution to journal › Book/Film/Article review › peer-review

Abstract

James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?—The Cognitive Science Debate Oxford University Press, 2016, ISBN: 9780190249380

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	459–461
Number of pages	3
Journal	Review of Religous Research
Volume	58
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2
Publication status	Published - 8 Jun 2016

Access to Document

10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2

Cite this

@article{f344fae9fc5545bdb11a9c8d58e4da4b,

title = "Review of Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate",

abstract = "James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?—The Cognitive Science Debate Oxford University Press, 2016, ISBN: 9780190249380",

author = "\{Coleman III\}, \{Thomas Joseph\}",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2",

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "459–461",

journal = "Review of Religous Research ",

issn = "0034-673X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of Can Science Explain Religion?

T2 - The Cognitive Science Debate

AU - Coleman III, Thomas Joseph

PY - 2016/6/8

Y1 - 2016/6/8

N2 - James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?—The Cognitive Science Debate Oxford University Press, 2016, ISBN: 9780190249380

AB - James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?—The Cognitive Science Debate Oxford University Press, 2016, ISBN: 9780190249380

U2 - 10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2

DO - 10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

SN - 0034-673X

VL - 58

SP - 459

EP - 461

JO - Review of Religous Research

JF - Review of Religous Research

IS - 3

ER -

Review of Can Science Explain Religion? The Cognitive Science Debate

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this